Dino Encyclopedia Dino Encyclopedia
🔍
KO EN
☰

Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis Raath, 1972) is a basal sauropod (Sauropoda) dinosaur from the Early Jurassic (Sinemurian–Pliensbachian, approximately 199–188 Ma) of southern Africa (present-day Zimbabwe). It occupies a pivotal position in understanding the origin and early evolution of sauropods and was regarded for decades as the oldest known sauropod, remaining one of the most phylogenetically basal sauropod genera ever discovered. The name derives from the Latin Vulcanus (the Roman god of fire) and the Greek odon (tooth), referencing the discovery of the fossil in sandstone adjacent to basalt lava flows.

Vulcanodon already exhibited the characteristic sauropod body plan — columnar limbs, a long neck and tail, and obligate quadrupedal locomotion — yet retained primitive features in its pelvic structure reminiscent of basal sauropodomorphs ("prosauropods"), making it a key transitional form in the shift from bipedal sauropodomorphs to fully quadrupedal sauropods. The holotype (QG24) includes much of the pelvis, most of the hindlimbs, parts of the forelimbs, and twelve anterior caudal vertebrae, but crucially lacks the skull and cervical vertebrae, leaving significant uncertainty in full-body reconstructions. Body size estimates vary considerably across studies: Paul (2010) estimated a total length of approximately 11 m and a mass of about 3.5 t, while McPhee et al. (2018) estimated a greater body mass of approximately 10.3 t using stylopodial circumference regression.

Notably, the knife-shaped teeth originally found near the skeleton — and which inspired the genus name — were later shown to belong to an unidentified theropod that likely scavenged on the Vulcanodon carcass (Cooper, 1984), not to Vulcanodon itself. No teeth attributable to Vulcanodon have ever been recovered.

Overview

Name and Etymology

The genus name Vulcanodon combines the Latin Vulcanus (Vulcan, the Roman god of fire and the forge) with the Greek odon (tooth), literally meaning "volcano tooth" (Glut, 1997). The name was chosen because the skeleton was found in sandstone adjacent to basalt lava flows (the Batoka Formation) and because knife-shaped teeth discovered nearby were originally misattributed to this animal (Raath, 1972). The specific epithet karibaensis refers to the type locality on a small island in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe.

Taxonomic Status

Vulcanodon is universally accepted today as one of the most basal members of Sauropoda (Wilson & Sereno, 1998; Upchurch et al., 2004). In the original description, Raath (1972) classified it as an advanced "prosauropod" (possibly Melanorosauridae), based on the primitive pelvis and the carnivorous teeth found nearby. Cruickshank (1975) was the first to demonstrate sauropod affinities, citing the equal length of the fifth metatarsal relative to other metatarsals — a condition seen in sauropods but not in "prosauropods." Cooper (1984) redescribed the genus and erected the family Vulcanodontidae. The validity of Vulcanodontidae has been debated, but it was reintroduced by Allain & Aquesbi (2004, 2008) following the description of Tazoudasaurus. There are no junior synonyms; V. karibaensis remains the sole valid species.

Key Summary

Vulcanodon is a basal sauropod from the Early Jurassic arid environments of southern Africa, representing a critical transitional form between bipedal sauropodomorphs and the giant quadrupedal sauropods that would dominate later ecosystems.

Age, Stratigraphy, and Depositional Environment

Age Range

The geological age of Vulcanodon has been revised multiple times. The original description (Raath, 1972) placed the fossil near the Triassic–Jurassic boundary (Hettangian, approximately 200 Ma), making it the oldest known sauropod at that time. Yates et al. (2004) subsequently revised this to the Toarcian (approximately 175–183 Ma) based on Ar–Ar dating of the Batoka Basalt Formation lavas (approximately 180–179 Ma; Jones et al., 2001). However, in 2018, Viglietti et al. revisited the type locality during record-low lake levels at Lake Kariba, collecting new stratigraphic and sedimentological data. Their results confirmed that the holotype came from the uppermost Forest Sandstone Formation, not from interbedded sandstones within the Batoka Basalt Formation as previously assumed. Correlation of the upper Forest Sandstone with the Clarens Formation of the main Karoo Basin implies a Sinemurian–Pliensbachian age (approximately 199–188 Ma), potentially 10–15 million years older than the Toarcian estimate (Viglietti et al., 2018).

Formation and Lithology

The holotype was recovered from "Island 126/127" in Lake Kariba, within the Mid-Zambezi Basin of northern Zimbabwe. Viglietti et al. (2018) confirmed the source horizon as the uppermost Forest Sandstone Formation (Upper Karoo Group, Karoo Supergroup). The Forest Sandstone consists primarily of pinkish-white to brownish, fine- to medium-grained, well-sorted sandstone; the lower portion contains subaqueous deposits, while the upper parts are predominantly aeolian (wind-blown) in origin (Thompson, 1975; Viglietti et al., 2018). The fossil was found near the top of an approximately 30 m-thick bedded layer of sand- and siltstone, overlain by the flood basalts of the Batoka Basalt Formation.

Paleoenvironment

Cooper (1984) interpreted the depositional environment as desert-like and arid, based on the aeolian sands of the Forest Sandstone Formation. The sediments in which Vulcanodon was found likely represent distal alluvial fan deposits transitioning into a desert landscape, possibly containing ephemeral lakes during wet seasons. The individual may have inhabited the margins of wadis cutting into these alluvial fan deposits, although post-mortem transport of the carcass by flooding cannot be ruled out (Cooper, 1984). This interpretation was significant in challenging the prevailing hypothesis that sauropod gigantism evolved as an adaptation to aquatic life — Vulcanodon demonstrated that large body size had already appeared in terrestrial, arid environments.

Specimens and Diagnostic Features

Holotype (QG24)

The holotype specimen QG24 is housed at the Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe in Bulawayo. The first bone was discovered in July 1969 by B. A. Gibson, a harbourmaster from the town of Kariba, and the specimen was collected during three field campaigns in October 1969, March 1970, and May 1970. It was formally described by Michael Raath in 1972. The preserved elements include:

ElementPreservationNotes
Pelvis (including sacrum)Four fused sacral vertebrae, both ilia, ischia, and pubesArticulated
Left hindlimbFemur, tibia, fibula, most of the footArticulated; femur length 110 cm
Right femurIsolatedSame individual as left limb
Caudal vertebrae12 anterior caudalsArticulated
ForelimbRight radius and ulna, some metacarpals and phalanges from both forefeetDisarticulated
Skull, cervicals, dorsal vertebraeNot preservedMajor source of reconstruction uncertainty

Subsequent visits by Bond and Cooper yielded a scapula (QG152) and a cervical vertebra fragment, though these may belong to a different individual (Cooper, 1984).

Raath (1972) noted nine fragmentary carnivorous teeth near the pelvic region. He initially attributed them to Vulcanodon, suggesting a death pose had repositioned the skull over the pelvis. Cooper (1984) demonstrated that these teeth belonged to an unidentified theropod that likely scavenged on the carcass.

Diagnostic Features

Key diagnostic features based on Cooper (1984) and Wilson & Sereno (1998) include:

  • Sacrum composed of four fused sacral vertebrae (basal sauropodomorphs possess only three)
  • Incipient lateral excavations on the caudal centra, producing a waisted appearance in ventral view — precursors to the extensive pleurocoels of derived sauropods
  • Fifth metatarsal equal in length to other metatarsals (a shared derived character of Sauropoda; Cruickshank, 1975)
  • Large, laterally compressed hallux claw (shared with basal sauropodomorphs)
  • Nail-like claws on digits II and III, broader than deep — shared exclusively with Tazoudasaurus among known sauropods (Allain & Aquesbi, 2008)
  • Primitive pelvis: fossa on the brevis shelf of the ilium, absent in all more derived sauropods (Fechner, 2009)

Specimen Limitations

The complete absence of the skull, cervical vertebrae, and dorsal vertebrae precludes any direct information on cranial morphology, neck length, or total body length. The commonly cited figure of 6.5 m represents only the preserved portion of the skeleton (excluding the neck and head); the actual total length was considerably greater (Paul, 2010, estimated approximately 11 m). The referred specimens (QG152 scapula and cervical fragment) may belong to a different individual or even a different taxon, requiring caution in their use.

Morphology and Function

Body Size

Size estimates for Vulcanodon vary considerably depending on methodology and assumptions about the missing portions of the skeleton.

StudyEstimated length (m)Estimated mass (t)Method / Notes
Holtz (2008)~6.5Not providedPreserved portion only (excluding neck and skull)
Paul (2010)~11~3.5Full reconstruction-based estimate
McPhee et al. (2018)Not provided~10.3Stylopodial circumference regression

The large discrepancy reflects both the incompleteness of the specimen (unknown neck length) and methodological differences in mass estimation.

Limbs and Locomotion

Vulcanodon's limbs were robust and columnar, already displaying the typical sauropod body plan (Raath, 1972). The forelimbs reached approximately 76% of hindlimb length, relatively long for a basal sauropod (Upchurch, 1995). They were straight and gracile, with a V-shaped proximal ulna — features much more similar to derived sauropods than to basal sauropodomorphs (Klein et al., 2011).

The lower leg, metatarsus, and toes were shortened compared to bipedal ancestors but not as reduced as in later sauropods (Wilson, 2005). The feet were semiplantigrade, with both the digits and part of the metatarsals contacting the ground — a derived feature absent in more basal sauropods like Isanosaurus. However, the distal phalanges were not reduced, a condition seen in Shunosaurus and all more derived sauropods, indicating that while muscle positioning was shifting, reduction of the distal limb elements had not yet occurred (Fechner, 2009).

Pelvis and Tail

The pelvis retained relatively primitive features reminiscent of basal sauropodomorphs (Raath, 1972; Cooper, 1984). The fossa on the brevis shelf of the ilium is a notable primitive character absent in derived sauropods (Fechner, 2009). The incipient excavations on the lateral sides of the caudal centra are interpreted as precursors to the extensive pleurocoels that characterize later sauropod vertebrae (Cooper, 1984).

Diet and Ecology

Diet

Vulcanodon is classified as a herbivore. The knife-shaped teeth originally found near the skeleton suggested an omnivorous or carnivorous diet, but these teeth were reidentified as belonging to a scavenging theropod (Cooper, 1984). No teeth directly attributable to Vulcanodon have been recovered, so dietary inference rests primarily on phylogenetic bracketing (Sauropoda is an exclusively herbivorous clade) and body plan. No direct evidence from gut contents, tooth wear, bite marks, or stable isotope analysis is available.

Ecological Role

As a medium- to large-bodied herbivore in the arid Early Jurassic environments of southern Africa, Vulcanodon coexisted with the basal sauropodomorph Massospondylus, the theropod Megapnosaurus (=Syntarsus) rhodesiensis, and primitive crocodylomorphs (protosuchids) in the Forest Sandstone fauna (Weishampel et al., 2004). The theropod teeth found near the carcass provide direct evidence for the presence of predators or scavengers in this ecosystem.

Cooper (1984) emphasized the significance of Vulcanodon inhabiting an arid environment, arguing that the large body size of early sauropods was not an adaptation to aquatic life — a paradigm shift in sauropod paleoecology. This interpretation has been broadly supported by subsequent research.

Distribution and Paleogeography

Locality Distribution

Vulcanodon is known from a single locality: "Island 126/127" in Lake Kariba, northern Zimbabwe. This island lies within the world's largest artificial reservoir (by volume), west of the Bumi Hills (Raath, 1972; Viglietti et al., 2018). No additional localities have yielded Vulcanodon material.

Paleogeography

During the Early Jurassic, Zimbabwe was situated in the southern portion of Gondwana. The approximate paleocoordinates for the Forest Sandstone Formation are approximately 35°S, 5°E (PBDB; Forest Sandstone Formation entry), placing the locality considerably further south (mid-latitudes) than the modern position of southern Africa. The contemporaneous occurrence of the closely related Tazoudasaurus in Morocco (northern Africa) and a sauropod caudal vertebra from the Upper Elliot Formation of South Africa (Yates et al., 2004) suggests that basal sauropods were distributed across much of Gondwana during the Early Jurassic.

Phylogeny and Taxonomic Debates

Taxonomic History

The taxonomic placement of Vulcanodon has been revised multiple times since its discovery:

  1. Raath (1972): Described as an advanced "prosauropod" (possibly Melanorosauridae), based on primitive pelvic features and the misattributed carnivorous teeth.
  2. Cruickshank (1975): First demonstrated sauropod affinities based on metatarsal proportions.
  3. Cooper (1984): Redescribed the genus and erected Vulcanodontidae, including Barapasaurus.
  4. Upchurch (1995): Showed that Barapasaurus was more derived than Vulcanodon, rendering Vulcanodontidae polyphyletic and effectively invalid.
  5. Allain et al. (2004, 2008): Reintroduced Vulcanodontidae as the clade containing Vulcanodon + Tazoudasaurus naimi, following the description of the latter from Morocco.

Recent Phylogenetic Analyses

In Wilson & Sereno (1998), Vulcanodon was placed at the base of Sauropoda. Allain & Aquesbi (2008) recovered it within Gravisauria as part of a Vulcanodontidae clade (Vulcanodon + Tazoudasaurus). Nair & Salisbury (2012) also recovered Vulcanodon at the base of Gravisauria as the sister taxon of Tazoudasaurus.

However, analyses by Apaldetti et al. (2011) and Remes et al. (2009) did not support the Vulcanodon–Tazoudasaurus sister-group relationship, and the validity of Vulcanodontidae remains without universal consensus.

Alternative Hypotheses

In some analyses, Vulcanodon is recovered in an unresolved position among various basal sauropods (e.g., Gongxianosaurus, Isanosaurus) rather than as the sister taxon of Tazoudasaurus. A key factor is the incomplete nature of the specimen (no skull or cervical vertebrae), which limits the number of scorable phylogenetic characters and reduces analytical resolution.

Reconstruction and Uncertainty

Confidence Assessment

FeatureStatusEvidence
Sauropod affinityConfirmedMultiple shared derived characters including metatarsal proportions (Cruickshank, 1975; Wilson & Sereno, 1998)
Obligate quadrupedalityConfirmedForelimb/hindlimb ratio of 76%, columnar limb morphology (Cooper, 1984; Upchurch, 1995)
Sinemurian–Pliensbachian ageProbableStratigraphic reassessment by Viglietti et al. (2018); no absolute radiometric date for the type horizon
Total length ~11 mHypothesisPaul (2010) estimate; neck and skull not preserved
Body mass ~3.5–10.3 tHypothesisWide range depending on methodology (Paul, 2010 vs. McPhee et al., 2018)
Vulcanodontidae validityHypothesisSupported by some analyses, not others; no universal consensus
Arid habitatProbableAeolian sandstone facies (Cooper, 1984; Viglietti et al., 2018); post-mortem transport not excluded

Popular Media vs. Scientific Consensus

Vulcanodon is frequently described in popular sources as a "small sauropod" of approximately 6.5 m in length. However, this figure represents only the preserved portion of the skeleton and excludes the entirely unknown neck and skull; the actual animal was considerably larger (Paul, 2010). Additionally, the original interpretation as an omnivorous or carnivorous "prosauropod" — based on the misattributed theropod teeth — has been entirely rejected since Cooper (1984).

Comparison with Related and Contemporary Taxa

TaxonAge (Ma)LocalityEstimated length (m)Estimated mass (t)Phylogenetic position
Vulcanodon karibaensis~199–188Zimbabwe~6.5–11~3.5–10.3Basal Sauropoda (Gravisauria)
Tazoudasaurus naimi~183–175Morocco~9UndeterminedBasal Sauropoda (Vulcanodontidae?)
Barapasaurus tagorei~184–175India~14UndeterminedNear Eusauropoda
Isanosaurus attavipachi~210Thailand~6.5–15 (uncertain)UndeterminedBasal Sauropoda
Antetonitrus ingenipes~215–210South Africa~8–10~1–2Basal Sauropoda / transitional
Ledumahadi mafube~200South AfricaUndetermined~12Basal sauropodomorph (outgroup to Sauropoda)

Vulcanodon shares the greatest number of derived features with Tazoudasaurus, including nail-like claws on digits II and III and a narrow sacrum — the basis for the proposed Vulcanodontidae clade (Allain & Aquesbi, 2008). In contrast, Barapasaurus is more derived and cannot be included in the same family (Upchurch, 1995).

Data Tables

Specimen Summary

SpecimenElementsConditionRepositoryReferences
QG24 (holotype)Pelvis, left hindlimb and foot, right femur, 12 anterior caudals, right forearm and some manual elementsPartially articulated, some disarticulatedNatural History Museum of Zimbabwe, BulawayoRaath (1972); Cooper (1984)
QG152ScapulaDisarticulatedNatural History Museum of Zimbabwe, BulawayoCooper (1984)
(Unnumbered cervical fragment)Cervical vertebra fragmentDisarticulatedNatural History Museum of Zimbabwe, BulawayoCooper (1984)

Stratigraphic and Age Summary

ItemDetailsBasis
FormationForest Sandstone Formation (uppermost)Viglietti et al. (2018)
Correlative unitClarens Formation (main Karoo Basin, South Africa)Viglietti et al. (2018)
Age (current estimate)Sinemurian–Pliensbachian (~199–188 Ma)Viglietti et al. (2018)
Age (previous estimate)Toarcian (~183–175 Ma)Yates et al. (2004)
Age (original estimate)Hettangian (~200 Ma)Raath (1972)
LithologyFine- to medium-grained sandstone, siltstone (aeolian / distal alluvial fan)Cooper (1984); Viglietti et al. (2018)

Fun Facts

💡

Vulcanodon's name means 'volcano tooth,' yet the teeth that inspired the name turned out to belong not to Vulcanodon itself but to a theropod (carnivorous dinosaur) that had scavenged on its carcass.

💡

Vulcanodon was discovered on a tiny island in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe — one of the world's largest artificial reservoirs — and the island has no official name, known only as 'Island 126/127.'

💡

For decades, Vulcanodon held the title of 'oldest known sauropod,' but it lost this distinction following the discovery of Isanosaurus in Thailand (2000) and a stratigraphic reinterpretation in 2018.

💡

Vulcanodon's femur (thighbone) measured 110 cm in length — modest by later sauropod standards but already impressively large for most dinosaurs of its time.

💡

The discovery of Vulcanodon in an arid, desert-like environment helped overturn the long-standing hypothesis that sauropods evolved their giant size as an adaptation to aquatic life.

💡

Vulcanodon's sacrum consists of four fused vertebrae, one more than the three found in basal sauropodomorphs ('prosauropods'), marking a key step in the evolution toward the sauropod body plan.

💡

The nail-like, wider-than-deep claws on Vulcanodon's second and third toes are a unique feature shared among all known sauropods only with Tazoudasaurus from Morocco.

💡

Record-low water levels at Lake Kariba in 2016 exposed geological strata unseen for over 20 years, allowing researchers to revisit the Vulcanodon type locality and revise its age by 10–15 million years.

💡

Vulcanodon was only the second dinosaur ever formally named from Zimbabwe, after Syntarsus rhodesiensis (now Megapnosaurus) in 1969.

💡

Vulcanodon's forelimbs were approximately 76% the length of its hindlimbs, directly illustrating an intermediate stage in the evolutionary transition from bipedal ancestors to fully quadrupedal sauropods.

FAQ

QWhy is Vulcanodon called 'volcano tooth' if the teeth don't belong to it?

The name Vulcanodon means 'volcano tooth,' referring to the fossil's discovery in sandstone near basalt lava flows (volcanic deposits) and the knife-shaped teeth originally found near the skeleton. However, Cooper (1984) later showed that these teeth belonged to an unidentified theropod (carnivorous dinosaur) that likely scavenged on the Vulcanodon carcass. No teeth attributable to Vulcanodon itself have ever been found — making the name somewhat ironic.

QWas Vulcanodon really the oldest sauropod?

For decades, Vulcanodon was regarded as the oldest known sauropod. However, this status has since been revised. In 2000, Isanosaurus from Thailand was described as a Late Triassic sauropod, predating Vulcanodon. Additionally, Antetonitrus from South Africa is another candidate for one of the earliest sauropods. Vulcanodon is now considered 'one of the most basal sauropods known' rather than the oldest.

QHow large was Vulcanodon?

Estimates vary significantly. The preserved portion of the skeleton (excluding the unknown neck and skull) measures approximately 6.5 m. Paul (2010) estimated a total length of about 11 m and a mass of approximately 3.5 tonnes. McPhee et al. (2018) estimated a higher body mass of approximately 10.3 tonnes using limb bone circumference regression. The wide range reflects the incompleteness of the specimen.

QWhich parts of Vulcanodon's skeleton were found?

The holotype (QG24) includes the pelvis with four fused sacral vertebrae, most of the left hindlimb and foot, a right femur, twelve anterior caudal (tail) vertebrae, the right forearm (radius and ulna), and some hand bones. Crucially, the skull, cervical (neck) vertebrae, and dorsal (back) vertebrae were not preserved.

QWhat kind of environment did Vulcanodon live in?

Based on Cooper's (1984) sedimentological analysis, Vulcanodon inhabited an arid, desert-like environment. The Forest Sandstone Formation consists of aeolian (wind-blown) dune sands, and the fossil-bearing sediments represent distal alluvial fan deposits transitioning into desert terrain, possibly with ephemeral lakes forming near wadis during wet seasons.

QIs the family Vulcanodontidae a valid taxonomic group?

This remains debated. Cooper (1984) erected Vulcanodontidae to include Vulcanodon and Barapasaurus, but Upchurch (1995) demonstrated that Barapasaurus was more derived, rendering the family polyphyletic. Allain et al. (2004, 2008) reintroduced the family to unite Vulcanodon and Tazoudasaurus, but other phylogenetic analyses have not supported this sister-group relationship, so no universal consensus has been reached.

QWhy has Vulcanodon's age been revised so many times?

The original description (1972) assumed the fossil lay between two basalt layers within the Batoka Formation, suggesting a Hettangian age (~200 Ma). Radiometric dating of the basalts later revised this to Toarcian (~183–175 Ma). Then in 2018, direct stratigraphic re-examination during record-low lake levels revealed the actual source horizon was the uppermost Forest Sandstone Formation, implying a Sinemurian–Pliensbachian age (~199–188 Ma) — approximately 10–15 million years older than the Toarcian estimate.

QIs Vulcanodon a 'prosauropod' or a sauropod?

Vulcanodon is a true sauropod. Raath (1972) originally classified it as an advanced 'prosauropod' based on primitive pelvic features and the misattributed carnivorous teeth. Cruickshank (1975) first demonstrated sauropod affinities using metatarsal proportions, and all subsequent studies have confirmed its placement within Sauropoda.

QWhat is the closest relative of Vulcanodon?

Some phylogenetic analyses (Allain & Aquesbi, 2008; Nair & Salisbury, 2012) recover Tazoudasaurus naimi from Morocco as the closest relative (sister taxon) of Vulcanodon. The two genera share unique features including nail-like claws on digits II and III and a narrow sacrum. However, this relationship is not supported by all analyses.

QWhere can Vulcanodon fossils be seen today?

The holotype and referred specimens are housed at the Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.

📚References

  1. Raath, M. A. (1972). Fossil vertebrate studies in Rhodesia: a new dinosaur (Reptilia, Saurischia) from near the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Arnoldia, 5, 1–7.
  2. Cruickshank, A. R. I. (1975). Origin of sauropod dinosaurs. South African Journal of Science, 71, 89–90.
  3. Cooper, M. R. (1984). A reassessment of Vulcanodon karibaensis Raath (Dinosauria: Saurischia) and the origin of the Sauropoda. Palaeontologia Africana, 25, 203–231.
  4. Upchurch, P. (1995). The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 349(1330), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0125
  5. Wilson, J. A. & Sereno, P. C. (1998). Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18(sup002), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1998.10011115
  6. Allain, R., Aquesbi, N., Dejax, J., Meyer, C., Monbaron, M., Montenat, C., Richir, P., Rochdy, M., Russell, D. & Taquet, P. (2004). A basal sauropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of Morocco. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 3(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2004.03.001
  7. Yates, A. M., Hancox, P. J. & Rubidge, B. S. (2004). First record of a sauropod dinosaur from the upper Elliot Formation (Early Jurassic) of South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 100(9–10), 504–506.
  8. Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M. & Dodson, P. (2004). Sauropoda. In D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson & H. Osmolska (eds.), The Dinosauria (2nd ed.), pp. 259–322. University of California Press.
  9. Wilson, J. A. (2005). Overview of sauropod phylogeny and evolution. In K. A. Curry Rogers & J. A. Wilson (eds.), The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology, pp. 15–49. University of California Press.
  10. Allain, R. & Aquesbi, N. (2008). Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Tazoudasaurus naimi (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the late Early Jurassic of Morocco. Geodiversitas, 30(2), 345–424.
  11. Paul, G. S. (2010). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. p. 172.
  12. Fechner, R. (2009). Morphofunctional evolution of the pelvic girdle and hindlimb of Dinosauromorpha on the lineage to Sauropoda. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, pp. 111–133.
  13. Nair, J. P. & Salisbury, S. W. (2012). New anatomical information on Rhoetosaurus brownei Longman, 1926, a gravisaurian sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Queensland, Australia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 32(2), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2012.622324
  14. Viglietti, P. A., Barrett, P. M., Broderick, T. J., Munyikwa, D., MacNiven, R., Broderick, L., Chapelle, K., Glynn, D., Edwards, S., Zondo, M., Broderick, P. & Choiniere, J. N. (2018). Stratigraphy of the Vulcanodon type locality and its implications for regional correlations within the Karoo Supergroup. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 137, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.10.015
  15. McPhee, B. W., Benson, R. B. J., Botha-Brink, J., Bordy, E. M. & Choiniere, J. N. (2018). A giant dinosaur from the earliest Jurassic of South Africa and the transition to quadrupedality in early sauropodomorphs. Current Biology, 28(19), 3143–3151.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.063
  16. Glut, D. F. (1997). Dinosaurs, the Encyclopedia. McFarland & Company, pp. 975–977.
  17. Remes, K., Ortega, F., Fierro, I., Joger, U., Kosma, R., Ferrer, J. M. M., Ide, O. A. & Maga, A. (2009). A new basal sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Niger and the early evolution of Sauropoda. PLoS ONE, 4(9), e6924. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006924
  18. Apaldetti, C., Martinez, R. N., Alcober, O. A. & Pol, D. (2011). A new basal sauropodomorph (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from Quebrada del Barro Formation, northwestern Argentina. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e26964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026964
  19. Barrett, P. M., Sciscio, L., Viglietti, P. A., Broderick, T. J., Suarez, C. A., Sharman, G. R., Jones, A. S., Munyikwa, D., Edwards, S. F., Chapelle, K. E. J., Dollman, K. N., Zondo, M. & Choiniere, J. N. (2020). Sedimentology and palaeontology of the Upper Karoo Group in the Mid-Zambezi Basin, Zimbabwe: new localities and their implications for interbasinal correlation. Geological Magazine, 158(6), 1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820001132
  20. Klein, N., Remes, K., Gee, C. T. & Sander, M. P. (2011). Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs: Understanding the Lives of Giants. Indiana University Press, pp. 136–139.

Gallery

5images

Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period prehistoric life illustration | DinoLifePedia
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period · Herbivore · DinoLifePedia prehistoric encyclopedia image
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period prehistoric life illustration | DinoLifePedia
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period · Herbivore · DinoLifePedia prehistoric encyclopedia image
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period prehistoric life illustration | DinoLifePedia
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period · Herbivore · DinoLifePedia prehistoric encyclopedia image
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period prehistoric life illustration | DinoLifePedia
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period · Herbivore · DinoLifePedia prehistoric encyclopedia image
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period prehistoric life illustration | DinoLifePedia
Vulcanodon (Vulcanodon karibaensis) — Dinosaurs · Jurassic Period · Herbivore · DinoLifePedia prehistoric encyclopedia image

Related Species

View All
Top End