Pterodaustro

Cretaceous Period Omnivore Creature Type

Pterodaustro guinazui

Scientific Name: "Pterodaustro: Greek pteron (wing) + Latin auster (south wind/south) = 'wing from the south'; guinazui: honoring Argentine paleontologist Román Guiñazú"

🕐Cretaceous Period
🍽️Omnivore

Physical Characteristics

📏
Size0.7~1m
⚖️
Weight4~9.2kg
🦅
Wingspan2.5m

Discovery

📅
Discovery Year1970Year
👤
DiscovererJosé F. Bonaparte
📍
Discovery LocationSan Luis Province, Argentina (Parque Nacional Sierra de las Quijadas)

Habitat

🏔️
Geological FormationLagarcito Formation
🌍
EnvironmentFluvio-lacustrine — perennial shallow lake on an alluvial sandy flat under semiarid, seasonal climate (Chiappe et al., 1998)
🪨
LithologyLaminated claystone, siltstone, fine sandstone
Pterodaustro (Pterodaustro guinazui) restoration

Pterodaustro guinazui Bonaparte, 1970 is a ctenochasmatid pterodactyloid pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous (Albian, ~105 Ma) of San Luis Province, Argentina. The generic name combines Greek pteron (wing) with Latin auster (south wind), yielding a condensed pteron de austro — 'wing from the south.' The specific epithet honors the Argentine paleontologist Román Guiñazú; the original spelling guiñazui was emended to guinazui by Peter Wellnhofer in 1978 because ICZN rules prohibit diacritical marks in taxonomic names.

Pterodaustro is distinguished by approximately one thousand bristle-like teeth in its lower jaws — a unique filter-feeding apparatus among pterosaurs that convergently parallels the feeding mechanism of modern flamingos. This dental specialization, combined with small globular crushing teeth in the upper jaw, represents one of the most extreme trophic adaptations known in any flying reptile. Maximum adult wingspan is estimated at approximately 2.5–3 m and body mass at about 9.2 kg (Naish et al., 2021).

The genus is known from over 750 individual specimens recovered from a single ~50 m² quarry — the 'Loma del Pterodaustro' locality in the Lagarcito Formation — making it one of the best-represented pterosaurs in the fossil record, with every ontogenetic stage documented from egg to adult (Chiappe et al., 1998). Pterodaustro also holds several paleontological firsts: the first gastroliths (gizzard stones) reported for any pterosaur (Codorniú et al., 2009), the first three-dimensionally preserved pterosaur egg (Grellet-Tinner et al., 2014), and the first putative medullary bone in a non-dinosaurian archosaur (Chinsamy et al., 2009 — though this interpretation remains debated).

Overview

Name and Etymology

The genus name Pterodaustro is a condensation of the Greek pteron (wing) and Latin de austro (from the south), meaning 'wing from the south.' José F. Bonaparte first used the name in 1969, but without a formal description it constituted a nomen nudum. The valid description followed in 1970 (Bonaparte, 1970), establishing Pterodaustro guiñazui as the type species. The tilde in the specific name was removed by Wellnhofer (1978) in compliance with ICZN nomenclatural rules, producing the currently accepted form guinazui.

Taxonomic Status

Pterodaustro is a monotypic genus; the sole recognized species is P. guinazui. Puntanipterus Bonaparte & Sánchez, 1975 is generally regarded as a junior synonym (Codorniú & Gasparini, 2007). Bonaparte (1970) originally assigned the genus to Pterodactylidae; in 1971 he erected the family Pterodaustriidae based on its unique dentition. Since 1996, successive cladistic analyses by Kellner (1996), Unwin (1996), and later workers have consistently recovered Pterodaustro within Ctenochasmatidae, close to the Late Jurassic genus Ctenochasma.

One-sentence Summary

Pterodaustro is a filter-feeding pterosaur bearing approximately 1,000 bristle-like mandibular teeth, known from all ontogenetic stages through over 750 specimens, and one of the most specialized and best-documented pterosaurs ever discovered.

Stratigraphy, Age, and Depositional Environment

Age

Pterodaustro dates to the Albian stage of the Early Cretaceous, approximately 105 Ma. This age assignment is based on radiometric dates of 107.4–109.4 Ma from basaltic flows underlying the Lagarcito Formation at Quebrada de Hualtarán (Yrigoyen, 1975), corroborated by an Aptian–Albian palynoflora from the underlying La Cantera Formation (Gigante Group), and integrated sedimentological, stratigraphic, and paleontological data (Chiappe et al., 1998a, 2000).

Formation and Lithology

All confirmed specimens derive from the Lagarcito Formation in San Luis Province, central Argentina. The Lagarcito Formation caps the second depositional megasequence of the San Luis Basin — a rift basin generated during the breakup of Gondwana — overlying the thick red-bed succession of the Gigante Group. At the Loma del Pterodaustro locality (Quebrada de Hualtarán), the basal ~8 m of the Lagarcito section are divided into three lithofacies: (1) inversely graded, massive sandstones to matrix-supported conglomerates (debris flows); (2) fine-grained sandstones with flat tops and asymmetric ripples (sheetfloods on a sand flat); and (3) massive to laminated claystones, siltstones, and very fine sandstones (lake sequence) (Chiappe et al., 1998a). Virtually all fossils come from subfacies 3.1 — laminated, very fine sediments interpreted as offshore lacustrine deposits.

Paleoenvironment and Paleoclimate

The facies association, the absence of desiccation cracks and evaporite horizons, and the preservation of laminations collectively indicate a long-lived fluvio-lacustrine sequence. The lake was at least periodically thermally stratified, with an anoxic bottom that prevented bioturbation and favored the exceptional preservation of delicate structures — hence the classification of these beds as a Konservat-Lagerstätte (Chiappe et al., 1995, 1998a). The predominant paleoclimate during deposition is interpreted as semiarid and seasonal (Chiappe et al., 1998a). Associated biota includes semionotid and pleuropholid fishes, anurans, conchostracans, ostracods, diverse trace fossils, and plant remains, painting a picture of a nutrient-rich shallow lake surrounded by seasonal vegetation.

Specimens and Diagnostic Characters

Holotype and Key Specimens

The holotype is PVL 2571, a nearly complete right humerus housed at the Sección Paleontología de Vertebrados, Instituto Miguel Lillo (Tucumán, Argentina) (Bonaparte, 1970). Subsequent large-scale excavations in 1994, 1996, and 1998 at the Loma del Pterodaustro quarry yielded over 750 individual specimens, of which 288 had been catalogued by 2008.

SpecimenInstitutionPreserved ElementsSignificance
PVL 2571Instituto Miguel LilloRight humerusHolotype (Bonaparte, 1970)
PVL 3860Instituto Miguel LilloPartial skull + mandibleMost commonly figured specimen (Sánchez, 1973)
MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V-57Univ. Nacional de San LuisNearly complete skull + mandibleSkull length ~29 cm (Chiappe et al., 2000)
MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V-135Univ. Nacional de San LuisSkull + mandible (rostral half missing)~10% larger than V-57
MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V-175Univ. Nacional de San LuisNearly complete isolated mandibleDentition studies (Chiappe et al., 2000)
MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V246Univ. Nacional de San LuisEgg with embryoFirst pterosaur embryo (Chiappe et al., 2004)
MIC-V263Museo Interactivo de CienciasSkeleton with gastrolithsFirst pterosaur gastroliths (Codorniú et al., 2009)
MIC-V243Museo Interactivo de CienciasSkeleton with gastrolithsSecond gastrolith specimen
MMP 3562Museo Municipal de Ciencias NaturalesPartial skull (occipital region)Braincase study (Codorniú & Paulina-Carabajal, 2016)

Diagnostic Characters

Pterodaustro is diagnosed by the following combination of features that distinguish it from other ctenochasmatids and pterosaurs: approximately 1,000 bristle-like mandibular teeth set in two long grooves (each tooth oval in cross-section, 0.2–0.3 mm wide, ~3 cm long); minute spatulate-crowned maxillary teeth attached via ligaments to a specialized tooth pad adorned with rows of small ossicles rather than individual alveoli (Chiappe et al., 2000); a tetraradiate jugal (versus triradiate in other pterodactyloids), with a unique jugal–quadrate contact unknown in any other pterosaur; mandibular teeth extending along approximately 90% of mandibular length (compared to ≤65% in Ctenochasma and allies); and 22 caudal vertebrae, far exceeding the pterodactyloid maximum of 16 (Codorniú, 2005).

Morphology and Functional Anatomy

Body Size

Maximum adult wingspan is estimated at approximately 2.5–3 m, with a maximum body mass of about 9.2 kg (Naish, Witton & Martin-Silverstone, 2021). A hatchling with a wingspan of ~0.29 m is estimated at only ~23 g — roughly 1/400th of adult mass. Skull length in the largest known specimen (MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V-135) is approximately 10% greater than the 29 cm measured in MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V-57, suggesting maximum skull length of about 32 cm. Body length (snout to tail tip, excluding wings) is estimated at roughly 0.7–1.0 m, though no single articulated skeleton preserves the complete body axis.

Cranial Anatomy

The skull is remarkably elongated, slender, and upwardly curved. In specimen MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V-57 the total cranial length is approximately 29 cm (Chiappe et al., 2000). The preorbital region comprises more than 85% of skull length. The snout and lower jaws curve strongly upward such that the tangent at the tip of the snout is perpendicular to the tangent at the jaw joint. The nasoantorbital fenestra is comparatively small, spanning only 10–12% of total skull length. The back of the skull is low-set, and there are some indications of a low parietal crest, though this remains uncertain (Chiappe et al., 2000). Codorniú & Paulina-Carabajal (2016) provided the first detailed description of the braincase, noting subtriangular elongated frontals, ossified ethmoidal elements, and short fan-shaped paroccipital processes.

Dentition

The mandibular teeth are true teeth composed of enamel, dentine, and pulp (Chiappe & Chinsamy, 1996). Despite their hard mineralogy, their extreme length-to-width ratio permitted bending of up to 45° (Currey, 1999). The upper jaw teeth are diminutive, with flat conical bases and spatulate crowns; they lack individual alveoli and appear to have been held by ligaments in a specialized tooth pad (Chiappe et al., 2000). Recent palaeohistological work by Cerda & Codorniú (2023) confirmed that the periodontium and implantation mode of both upper and lower teeth are highly unusual among reptiles, representing a specialized adaptation for filter feeding. Notably, the upper teeth may not have been replaced, unlike those of most other reptiles.

Tail and Hindlimbs

The tail is unusually long for a pterodactyloid, containing 22 caudal vertebrae — exceeding the group maximum of 16 (Codorniú, 2005). The hindlimbs are robust and the feet large, interpreted as adaptations for swimming and shoreline locomotion shared with other ctenochasmatoids (Witton, 2013). Burlot et al. (2024) provided the first complete description of the ankle joint across three ontogenetic stages, demonstrating a range of motion consistent with wading behavior similar to that of modern flamingos or geese.

Diet and Ecology

Filter-Feeding Mechanism

Pterodaustro's diet is interpreted as filter feeding, convergent with modern flamingos (Wellnhofer, 1991; Witton, 2013). The upwardly curved lower jaw with its dense brush of bristle-like teeth would have been swept through shallow water to trap small crustaceans, plankton, and algae, which were then crushed by the small globular upper teeth before being swallowed. This interpretation is supported not only by dental morphology but also by the abundance of small invertebrates preserved in the sediments of the fossil locality.

Gastroliths

At least two specimens (MIC-V263, MIC-V243) preserve gastroliths (gizzard stones) within the body cavity — the first ever reported for any pterosaur (Codorniú et al., 2009). These clusters of small angular stones may have helped crush the hard exoskeletons of crustaceans, improving digestive efficiency. However, since gastroliths are found in only a small number of specimens, it remains debatable whether they were intentionally ingested or accidentally swallowed along with food.

Nocturnality Hypothesis

Scleral ring morphology analysis by Schmitz & Motani (2011) suggested that Pterodaustro may have been nocturnal, with activity patterns similar to modern anseriform birds (ducks, geese) that feed at night. However, the methodology has been questioned by Hall et al. (2011), and the nocturnality hypothesis remains unconfirmed.

Pink Coloration Hypothesis

Robert Bakker proposed that, like flamingos whose pink color derives from carotenoid pigments in crustaceans, Pterodaustro may have also exhibited a pinkish hue. However, Shawkey & Hill (2005) demonstrated that carotenoid expression requires specific structural features in feathers or integumentary fibers, casting doubt on this idea. There is no direct evidence for Pterodaustro's body coloration, and the 'pink pterosaur' label remains a popular but unsubstantiated hypothesis.

Growth and Reproduction

Ontogeny

Bone histology by Chinsamy et al. (2008) revealed that Pterodaustro juveniles grew rapidly for the first ~2 years after hatching, reaching approximately 53% of adult body size. At this point they are inferred to have attained sexual maturity, after which growth continued at a slower rate for another 4–5 years until reaching a determinate growth stop. This was the first quantitatively documented growth curve for any pterosaur species.

Eggs and Embryos

In 2004, specimen MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V246 yielded an embryo preserved within its egg (Chiappe et al., 2004). The egg is elongated (~6 cm long, ~22 mm wide) with a primarily flexible shell covered by a thin (~0.3 mm) layer of calcite. In 2014, three-dimensionally preserved eggs were additionally reported (Grellet-Tinner et al., 2014), providing critical data on pterosaur nesting strategies.

Naish, Witton & Martin-Silverstone (2021) estimated that Pterodaustro hatchlings had a wingspan of ~29 cm and body mass of ~23 g, with humerus bones that were actually stronger than those of adults. This supports the hypothesis that pterosaurs were super-precocial, capable of powered flight almost immediately after hatching.

Medullary Bone Debate

Chinsamy et al. (2009) reported possible medullary bone tissue in the largest known femur (V 382). Medullary bone is otherwise known only from egg-laying female birds and some non-avian dinosaurs, so this would represent the first occurrence in a non-dinosaurian archosaur. However, Padian & Woodward (2021) suggested this tissue may instead represent crushed endosteal tissue, and the interpretation remains contentious.

Distribution and Paleogeography

Geographic Range

All confirmed Pterodaustro fossils come from a single locality in the Lagarcito Formation of San Luis Province, Argentina. A previous report from the Quebrada La Carreta locality in the Antofagasta Region of Chile was subsequently reinterpreted by Martill et al. (2000), who reassigned those specimens to the dsungaripterid Domeykodactylus ceciliae, thereby invalidating the Chilean occurrence.

Paleogeographic Position

During the Early Cretaceous, the San Luis region was situated at approximately paleolatitude 29°S and paleolongitude 26°W, on the western margin of Gondwana. The area occupied a rift basin under a semiarid subtropical climate, broadly consistent with the sedimentological and paleobotanical evidence from the Lagarcito Formation.

Phylogeny and Classification

Classification History

Bonaparte (1970) initially placed Pterodaustro in Pterodactylidae. In 1971 he erected the family Pterodaustriidae to accommodate its unique dentition. Bennett (1994) placed Pterodaustro in a trichotomy with Pterodactylus kochi and all other pterodactyloids, separating it from Ctenochasmatidae — a view that has not gained support.

Current Phylogenetic Position

Since 1996, cladistic analyses by Kellner (1996) and subsequent authors have consistently recovered Pterodaustro within Ctenochasmatidae, as the sister taxon of the Late Jurassic Ctenochasma (Chiappe et al., 2000; Witton, 2013). In the topology of Longrich, Martill & Andres (2018), Pterodaustro occupies a position within the tribe Pterodaustrini, basal to Beipiaopterus and Gegepterus.

RankTaxon
OrderPterosauria
SuborderPterodactyloidea
FamilyCtenochasmatidae
TribePterodaustrini (Longrich et al., 2018)
GenusPterodaustro Bonaparte, 1970
SpeciesP. guinazui Bonaparte, 1970

The previous database classification as 'azhdarchid' is incorrect. Pterodaustro belongs to Ctenochasmatidae, which is phylogenetically distant from Azhdarchidae.

Restoration and Uncertainty

Confirmed Facts

The following are established by direct fossil evidence: a filter-feeding dentition (bristle-like mandibular teeth + small globular upper teeth); placement within Ctenochasmatidae; provenance from the Albian Lagarcito Formation; an ontogenetic series spanning all growth stages based on 750+ specimens; the existence of an embryo within an egg; and the first record of gastroliths in any pterosaur.

Well-Supported Interpretations

Flamingo-like filter-feeding behavior, powered flight capability in hatchlings (Naish et al., 2021), wading locomotion (Burlot et al., 2024), and the ~2-year rapid growth phase followed by sexual maturation (Chinsamy et al., 2008) are all supported by multiple independent lines of evidence and are considered well-established, though technically inferential.

Hypotheses Under Debate

Nocturnality (Schmitz & Motani, 2011 vs. Hall et al., 2011), pink body coloration (Bakker's proposal vs. Shawkey & Hill, 2005), the presence of medullary bone (Chinsamy et al., 2009 vs. Padian & Woodward, 2021), and whether gastroliths were intentionally ingested all remain actively debated or require additional evidence.

Popular Misconceptions

Pterodaustro is frequently called the 'pink pterosaur' or 'prehistoric flamingo' in popular media, but there is no direct evidence for its body color — the pink hypothesis is speculative. Additionally, Pterodaustro is sometimes incorrectly referred to as a 'dinosaur.' Pterosaurs (Pterosauria) and dinosaurs (Dinosauria) are both archosaurs but constitute separate evolutionary lineages.

Comparison with Related Taxa

TaxonFamilyAgeWingspanDietKey Distinction
Pterodaustro guinazuiCtenochasmatidaeAlbian (~105 Ma)2.5–3 mFilter feeder~1,000 bristle-like mandibular teeth
Ctenochasma elegansCtenochasmatidaeKimmeridgian–Tithonian (~150 Ma)~1.2 mFilter feederSlender tooth rows (tooth row covers less than 65% of mandible length)
Gegepterus changiCtenochasmatidaeAptian–Albian (~120 Ma)~1.5 mProbable filter feederChina (Jiuquan Fm.); fewer teeth
Gnathosaurus subulatusCtenochasmatidaeKimmeridgian (~155 Ma)~1.7 mProbable filter feederSpatulate snout; European occurrence

Among filter-feeding ctenochasmatids, Pterodaustro possesses the highest tooth count, the finest individual teeth, and by far the richest fossil record. It is also the only confirmed ctenochasmatid from South America, giving it outsized paleobiogeographic significance.

Fun Facts

💡
Pterodaustro's lower jaw contained approximately 1,000 bristle-like teeth — a filter-feeding apparatus functionally analogous to the baleen plates of modern whales.
💡
Pterodaustro was the first pterosaur in which gastroliths (gizzard stones) were ever discovered (Codorniú et al., 2009), suggesting it may have used them to grind the hard shells of small crustaceans.
💡
A Pterodaustro hatchling weighed only about 23 g — roughly 1/400th of the adult's ~9.2 kg — yet its wing bones were stronger than those of full-grown adults, suggesting it could fly right after hatching.
💡
Over 750 individual specimens have been recovered from a single quarry only about 50 square meters in area, making Pterodaustro one of the most completely known pterosaurs from egg to adult.
💡
Pterodaustro had 22 caudal (tail) vertebrae — an unusually long tail for a pterodactyloid, a group in which no other member exceeds 16.
💡
The preorbital portion of Pterodaustro's skull made up more than 85% of its total head length, and the long snout curved sharply upward — perfectly shaped for skimming shallow water.
💡
A Pterodaustro embryo discovered in 2004 (MHIN-UNSL-GEO-V246) remains one of the best-preserved pterosaur embryos ever found, encased in a thin-shelled egg only 6 cm long.
💡
Pterodaustro was the first pterosaur ever discovered in Argentina, found in the late 1960s by José Bonaparte, and launched the study of South American pterosaurs.
💡
The upper jaw teeth of Pterodaustro may not have been replaced during the animal's lifetime (Cerda & Codorniú, 2023) — an unusual trait among reptiles, which typically replace teeth continuously.
💡
A 2024 study of Pterodaustro's ankle joints (Burlot et al.) showed they were well-suited for wading in shallow water, much like modern flamingos or geese.

FAQ

?Is Pterodaustro a dinosaur?
No. Pterodaustro is a pterosaur (Pterosauria) — a flying reptile that is not a dinosaur. Both pterosaurs and dinosaurs belong to the larger group Archosauria, but they represent separate evolutionary lineages. Pterodaustro lived alongside dinosaurs during the Early Cretaceous but is neither an ancestor nor a descendant of any dinosaur.
?Was Pterodaustro actually pink?
This is uncertain. Robert Bakker proposed that carotenoid pigments from a crustacean-rich diet could have given Pterodaustro a pinkish hue, similar to flamingos. However, Shawkey & Hill (2005) showed that carotenoid expression requires specific microstructures in feathers or integumentary fibers, casting doubt on this hypothesis. There is no direct evidence for Pterodaustro's body coloration, so the 'pink pterosaur' label remains speculative.
?What were Pterodaustro's teeth like?
The lower jaw contained approximately 1,000 bristle-like teeth, each about 3 cm long and only 0.2–0.3 mm wide. These are true teeth with enamel, dentine, and pulp, and could flex up to 45° due to their extreme length-to-width ratio. The upper jaw bore tiny teeth with flat conical bases and spatulate crowns, used to crush filtered food items.
?How large was Pterodaustro?
Maximum adult wingspan was approximately 2.5–3 m and estimated body mass about 9.2 kg (Naish et al., 2021). Skull length reached approximately 29 cm or more (Chiappe et al., 2000), and body length is estimated at roughly 0.7–1.0 m. It was a relatively small pterosaur by Cretaceous standards.
?Could Pterodaustro hatchlings fly?
Evidence suggests yes. Naish, Witton & Martin-Silverstone (2021) found that Pterodaustro hatchlings (wingspan ~29 cm, mass ~23 g) had humeri that were actually stronger than those of adults. Combined with appropriate wing proportions, this supports the hypothesis that pterosaurs were super-precocial — capable of powered flight almost immediately after hatching.
?How many Pterodaustro fossils have been found?
Over 750 individual specimens have been recovered from the ~50 m² Loma del Pterodaustro quarry in San Luis Province, Argentina, with 288 formally catalogued as of 2008. This makes Pterodaustro one of the best-known pterosaurs, with all ontogenetic stages from egg to adult represented.
?Was Pterodaustro nocturnal?
Possibly. Schmitz & Motani (2011) analyzed its scleral ring morphology and suggested nocturnal habits similar to modern waterfowl that feed at night. However, Hall et al. (2011) challenged the methodology, so nocturnality remains unconfirmed and requires further investigation.
?What family does Pterodaustro belong to?
Pterodaustro belongs to Ctenochasmatidae, a family of filter-feeding pterodactyloid pterosaurs. It is closely related to the Late Jurassic Ctenochasma. Although it was once placed in its own family (Pterodaustriidae), cladistic analyses since 1996 have consistently placed it within Ctenochasmatidae. It is sometimes incorrectly classified as an azhdarchid, which is a phylogenetically distant family.

📚References

  • Bonaparte, J.F. (1970). Pterodaustro guinazui gen. et sp. nov. Pterosaurio de la Formación Lagarcito, Provincia de San Luis, Argentina y su significado en la geología regional (Pterodactylidae). Acta Geológica Lilloana, 10: 209–225.
  • Chiappe, L.M., Kellner, A.W.A., Rivarola, D., Davila, S. & Fox, M. (2000). Cranial Morphology of Pterodaustro guinazui (Pterosauria: Pterodactyloidea) from the Lower Cretaceous of Argentina. Contributions in Science, 483: 1–19. doi:10.5962/p.226796
  • Chiappe, L.M., Rivarola, D., Cione, A., et al. (1998). Biotic association and palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the \"Loma del Pterodaustro\" fossil site (Early Cretaceous, Argentina). Geobios, 31(3): 349–369. doi:10.1016/S0016-6995(98)80018-1
  • Chinsamy, A., Codorniú, L. & Chiappe, L.M. (2008). Developmental growth patterns of the filter-feeder pterosaur, Pterodaustro guinazui. Biology Letters, 4(3): 282–285. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0004
  • Chinsamy, A., Codorniú, L. & Chiappe, L. (2009). Palaeobiological Implications of the Bone Histology of Pterodaustro guinazui. The Anatomical Record, 292(9): 1462–1477. doi:10.1002/ar.20990
  • Chiappe, L.M., Codorniú, L., Grellet-Tinner, G. & Rivarola, D. (2004). Argentinian unhatched pterosaur fossil. Nature, 432(7017): 571–572. doi:10.1038/432571a
  • Currey, J.D. (1999). The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202(23): 3285–3294. doi:10.1242/jeb.202.23.3285
  • Codorniú, L. & Paulina-Carabajal, A. (2016). Braincase anatomy of Pterodaustro guinazui, pterodactyloid pterosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 36(1): e1031340. doi:10.1080/02724634.2015.1031340
  • Codorniú, L., Chiappe, L.M., Arcucci, A. & Ortiz-Suarez, A. (2009). First occurrence of gastroliths in Pterosauria (Early Cretaceous, Argentina). XXIV Jornadas Argentinas de Paleontología de Vertebrados.
  • Cerda, I.A. & Codorniú, L. (2023). Palaeohistology reveals an unusual periodontium and tooth implantation in a filter-feeding pterodactyloid pterosaur, Pterodaustro guinazui, from the Lower Cretaceous of Argentina. Journal of Anatomy, 243(4): 579–589. doi:10.1111/joa.13878
  • Naish, D., Witton, M.P. & Martin-Silverstone, E. (2021). Powered flight in hatchling pterosaurs: evidence from wing form and bone strength. Scientific Reports, 11: 13130. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92499-z
  • Grellet-Tinner, G., Thompson, M., Fiorelli, L.E., et al. (2014). The first pterosaur 3-D egg: Implications for Pterodaustro guinazui nesting strategies. Geoscience Frontiers, 5(6): 759. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.05.002
  • Witton, M.P. (2013). Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691150613.
  • Longrich, N.R., Martill, D.M. & Andres, B. (2018). Late Maastrichtian pterosaurs from North Africa and mass extinction of Pterosauria at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. PLoS Biology, 16(3): e2001663. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001663
  • Schmitz, L. & Motani, R. (2011). Nocturnality in dinosaurs inferred from scleral ring and orbit morphology. Science, 332(6030): 705–708. doi:10.1126/science.1200043
  • Hall, M.I., Kirk, E.C., Kamilar, J.M. & Carrano, M.T. (2011). Comment on \"Nocturnality in Dinosaurs Inferred from Scleral Ring and Orbit Morphology\". Science, 334(6063): 1641. doi:10.1126/science.1208442
  • Burlot, R., Codorniú, L., Defend, L. & Laurin, M. (2024). The ankle joint of Pterodaustro guinazui. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 69(2): 329–350. doi:10.4202/app.01097.2023
  • Martill, D.M., Frey, E., Diaz, G.C. & Bell, C.M. (2000). Reinterpretation of a Chilean pterosaur and the occurrence of Dsungaripteridae in South America. Geological Magazine, 137(1): 19–25.
  • Shawkey, M.D. & Hill, G.E. (2005). Carotenoids need structural colours to shine. Biology Letters, 1(2): 121–124. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0289
  • Codorniú, L. & Gasparini, Z. (2007). Pterosauria. In Gasparini, Z., Salgado, L. & Coria, R.A. (eds.), Patagonian Mesozoic Reptiles. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN: 143–166.
  • Padian, K. & Woodward, H.N. (2021). Archosauromorpha: Avemetatarsalia – Dinosaurs and Their Relatives. In Vertebrate Skeletal Histology and Paleohistology. CRC Press. ISBN 9780815392880.

Gallery

2 images
  • Pterodaustro (Pterodaustro guinazui) 1
    Pterodaustro

    Pterodaustro · Cretaceous Period · Omnivore

  • Pterodaustro (Pterodaustro guinazui) 2
    Pterodaustro

    Pterodaustro · Cretaceous Period · Omnivore

🔗Related Creatures