Ankylosaurus

Cretaceous Period Herbivore Creature Type

Ankylosaurus magniventris

Scientific Name: "Greek ankulos (fused, stiffened) + sauros (lizard) = 'fused lizard'; species name magniventris from Latin magnus (great) + venter (belly), referring to the animal's wide body"

Local Name: Ankylosaurus

šŸ•Cretaceous Period
🌿Herbivore

Physical Characteristics

šŸ“
Size6~8m
āš–ļø
Weight4780~7950kg
šŸ“
Height1.7m

Discovery

šŸ“…
Discovery Year1908Year
šŸ‘¤
DiscovererBarnum Brown
šŸ“
Discovery LocationMontana, USA (holotype); Alberta, Canada; Wyoming, USA; Saskatchewan, Canada — western North America

Habitat

šŸ”ļø
Geological FormationHell Creek Formation, Lance Formation, Scollard Formation, Frenchman Formation, Ferris Formation
šŸŒ
EnvironmentLate Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) subtropical to warm-temperate floodplain and fluvial environment; sandstone–mudstone–siltstone dominated overbank and channel deposits of meandering river systems with adjacent wetlands and forests
🪨
LithologySandstone, mudstone, siltstone, carbonaceous shale
Ankylosaurus (Ankylosaurus magniventris) restoration

Ankylosaurus magniventris Brown, 1908 is a large armored dinosaur belonging to the family Ankylosauridae within the suborder Ankylosauria of Ornithischia. It lived during the latest Cretaceous (late Maastrichtian, approximately 68–66 Ma) in western North America and was the largest and last-surviving member of the Ankylosauridae. The genus name derives from the Greek ankulos (fused, stiffened) and sauros (lizard), referencing the extensive fusion of bones throughout the skull and skeleton—a condition known medically as ankylosis. The species epithet magniventris, from Latin magnus (great) and venter (belly), refers to the animal's exceptionally broad torso. Barnum Brown named the species in 1908 based on a partial skeleton discovered in 1906 in the Hell Creek Formation of Montana.

The most distinctive features of Ankylosaurus are the extensive body armor of bony osteoderms embedded in the skin and the large tail club formed by fused terminal osteoderms. The osteoderms varied widely in size (from about 1 cm to 35.5 cm in length) and covered the back, flanks, neck, and tail. The neck was protected by two semicircular cervical half-rings of fused armor plates, while the tail terminated in a massive bony club composed of two large osteoderms fused to the distal caudal vertebrae. The skull was broad, low, and triangular, bearing four horns—two squamosal horns projecting posterolaterally and two jugal horns pointing posteroventrally—and was adorned with a mosaic of scale-like cranial ornamentation (caputegulae).

Ankylosaurus is known from the Hell Creek, Lance, Scollard, Frenchman, and Ferris formations and coexisted with iconic dinosaurs including Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, and Edmontosaurus. Despite its status as the archetypal ankylosaur in popular culture, the fossil record of Ankylosaurus is remarkably incomplete—no complete skeleton has been discovered, and only a handful of specimens exist. Nevertheless, these remains reveal that Ankylosaurus had diverged significantly from related ankylosaurines in cranial anatomy, narial structure, body size, and tail club morphology (Arbour & Mallon, 2017).

Overview

Name and Etymology

The genus name Ankylosaurus combines the Greek ankulos (fused, stiffened, or bent) with sauros (lizard), drawing on the medical term ankylosis—the stiffening of a joint by fusion of bones. This reflects the extensive skeletal fusion observed throughout the animal's skull and postcranial skeleton (Brown, 1908). The species name magniventris is derived from Latin magnus (great) and venter (belly), describing the animal's remarkably wide body. Barnum Brown named Ankylosaurus magniventris in 1908, based on material excavated in 1906 by collector Peter Kaisen near Gilbert Creek in the Hell Creek Formation of Garfield County, Montana.

Taxonomic Status

Ankylosaurus is a monotypic genus; only the type species A. magniventris is currently recognized. Within the phylogenetic framework of Arbour & Currie (2016), it is placed in Ankylosauridae, subfamily Ankylosaurinae, tribe Ankylosaurini. Its closest known relatives are Anodontosaurus and Euoplocephalus. An early claim by Williston (1908) that Ankylosaurus was synonymous with Stegopelta was rejected, and the two genera are considered distinct (Carpenter, 2001).

Summary

The largest and last-surviving ankylosaurid dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of western North America, defined by its extensive bony armor, unique ventrolaterally-directed nostrils, and massive tail club.

Age, Stratigraphy, and Depositional Environment

Temporal Range

Ankylosaurus is restricted to the late Maastrichtian, approximately 68–66 Ma. The holotype (AMNH 5895) was recovered from 61–67 m below the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary in the Hell Creek Formation, and all other specimens likewise derive from latest Maastrichtian deposits (Carpenter, 2004; Arbour & Mallon, 2017). Ankylosaurus was among the very last non-avian dinosaurs, persisting until the K–Pg mass extinction event.

Formations and Lithology

Ankylosaurus fossils have been reported from the following formations:

FormationRegionKey SpecimensLithology
Hell Creek Fm.Montana, USAAMNH 5895 (holotype), CCM V03Sandstone, mudstone, siltstone
Lance Fm.Wyoming, USAAMNH 5866Sandstone, mudstone, calcareous siltstone
Scollard Fm.Alberta, CanadaAMNH 5214, CMN 8880Sandstone, mudstone, carbonaceous shale
Frenchman Fm.Saskatchewan, CanadaRSM P99.1, RSM P99.4Sandstone, mudstone
Ferris Fm.Wyoming, USAUW 26291, UW 26293, etc.Sandstone, mudstone

All of these formations are latest Maastrichtian in age and were deposited in the Western Interior of North America during the final stages of the retreat of the Western Interior Seaway.

Depositional Environment and Paleoclimate

The Hell Creek Formation and its correlatives are dominated by floodplain and meandering river deposits. Channel sandstones represent river fills, while fine-grained mudstones and siltstones record overbank sedimentation; intercalated carbonaceous shales indicate the presence of swamps and marshes (Fowler, 2020). The late Maastrichtian climate in this region was warmer and more humid than the present, with estimated mean annual temperatures of approximately 15–20°C. Ankylosaurus appears to have been rare within this environment. Carpenter (2004) and Arbour & Mallon (2017) suggested that Ankylosaurus may have preferred upland habitats, which would partly explain its scarcity in lowland fluvial deposits where fossilization potential is higher. A contemporary nodosaurid ankylosaur (Denversaurus or Edmontonia) occupied the same formations but apparently did not share the same ecological niche.

Specimens and Diagnostic Features

Holotype and Referred Specimens

Ankylosaurus is known from only a handful of specimens; no complete skeleton has been found:

SpecimenInstitutionPreserved ElementsLocality / FormationNotes
AMNH 5895 (holotype)American Museum of Natural HistoryPartial skull roof, 2 teeth, cervical/dorsal/caudal vertebrae, right scapulocoracoid, ribs, 30+ osteoderms, cervical half-ring fragmentsMontana, Hell Creek Fm.Collected by Peter Kaisen, 1906
AMNH 5214American Museum of Natural HistoryComplete skull and mandibles, tail club (only known example), ribs, caudal vertebrae, both humeri, left ischium and femur, right fibula, osteodermsAlberta, Scollard Fm.Best-preserved skull; only well-preserved tail club
CMN 8880Canadian Museum of NatureSkull and left mandibleAlberta, Scollard Fm.Largest known skull (length ~67.1 cm, width ~77 cm)
CCM V03Carter County MuseumPartial tail club handle (caudal vertebrae)Montana, Hell Creek Fm.Fragmentary
AMNH 5866American Museum of Natural History70+ osteodermsWyoming, Lance Fm.Originally attributed to Dynamosaurus (= Tyrannosaurus)

In 2017, Arbour & Mallon identified previously unrecognized elements of the holotype AMNH 5895, including an otic capsule fragment, maxilla fragment, right and left jugals, sacral centra, and additional cervical half-ring fragments.

Revised Diagnosis

The revised diagnosis by Arbour & Mallon (2017) identifies the following key autapomorphies distinguishing Ankylosaurus from other ankylosaurins: (1) a pattern of flat, hexagonal frontonasal caputegulae; (2) the nasal vestibule is uniquely roofed entirely by the loreal caputegulum (not the supranarial caputegulum), with external nares opening ventrolaterally rather than anteriorly—a feature unique among ankylosaurids; (3) 34–36 proportionally small maxillary teeth (each less than 2% of basal skull length); (4) U-shaped (rather than V-shaped) neural spines on the tail club handle vertebrae in dorsal view; and (5) a tail club knob approximately as wide transversely as it is long anteroposteriorly.

Limitations of the Fossil Record

The fossil record of Ankylosaurus is highly fragmentary. Much of the postcranial skeleton—including the pelvis, most of the tail, and the feet—remains unknown. The tail club is preserved in only one specimen (AMNH 5214), limiting understanding of individual variation. Despite being the iconic representative of Ankylosauridae in popular media, Ankylosaurus is actually known from far fewer remains than its close relatives Euoplocephalus and Anodontosaurus (Arbour & Mallon, 2017).

Morphology and Function

Body Size

Ankylosaurus was the largest known ankylosaurine and possibly the largest ankylosaurid overall. Carpenter (2004) estimated the individual with the largest skull (CMN 8880; length ~64.5 cm, width ~74.5 cm) at about 6.25 m in total length with a hip height of approximately 1.7 m. The smallest known skull (AMNH 5214; length ~55.5 cm, width ~64.5 cm) corresponded to an estimated body length of about 5.4 m and hip height of about 1.4 m.

Arbour & Mallon (2017) revised these estimates using comparisons with more complete ankylosaurines: CMN 8880 was estimated at 7.56–9.99 m in length and AMNH 5214 at 6.02–7.95 m. However, because AMNH 5214's vertebrae are not significantly larger than those of other ankylosaurines, the upper bound of nearly 10 m for large Ankylosaurus was considered an overestimate, and a realistic length of approximately 8 m was suggested. Body mass was estimated at approximately 4.78 tonnes for AMNH 5214 (Benson et al., 2014) and tentatively at approximately 7.95 tonnes for CMN 8880 (Arbour & Mallon, 2017).

Skull

The skull of Ankylosaurus was broad, low, and triangular—wider than long. The premaxillae bore a wide beak anteriorly, behind which small, leaf-shaped (phylliform) teeth were arranged in rows. The orbits were nearly circular to slightly oval. Posteriorly, two pyramidal squamosal horns projected posterolaterally from the skull roof, and two jugal horns projected posteroventrally below them. These horns are interpreted as osteoderms that became fused to the skull. The skull surface was covered in tile-like cranial ornamentation called caputegulae, whose pattern is taxonomically diagnostic.

The most remarkable cranial feature of Ankylosaurus is the position of the nostrils. In most ankylosaurids, the external nares face anteriorly or anterolaterally. In Ankylosaurus, the nares are displaced posteriorly and open ventrolaterally, unique among the family. This resulted from the anterior expansion of the loreal caputegulae (overlying the nasal bones), which entirely roof the nasal vestibule, giving the snout a distinctive bulbous appearance (Arbour & Mallon, 2017). Internally, the nasal cavities contained a complex looping airway and five pairs of sinuses on each side, which may have functioned in thermoregulation, water balance, or vocalization (Witmer & Ridgely, 2008).

Dentition

AMNH 5214 has approximately 34–35 dental alveoli (tooth sockets) in the maxilla and 71 in the mandible (35 left, 36 right). The teeth were very small and leaf-shaped with smooth enamel surfaces—a diagnostic feature. Counterintuitively, the teeth of the largest skull (CMN 8880) are absolutely smaller than those of the smallest skull (AMNH 5214), indicating that tooth size did not scale proportionally with skull size (Arbour & Mallon, 2017). This proportionally small tooth size allowed the jaws to accommodate more teeth than in any other ankylosaurine.

Postcranial Skeleton

The hind limbs were longer than the forelimbs, and Ankylosaurus was obligately quadrupedal. The holotype's scapula measures 61.5 cm in length and was fused with the coracoid. In AMNH 5214, the humerus is approximately 54 cm long and the femur approximately 67 cm—both extremely robust. The cervical vertebrae had broad neural spines that increased in height posteriorly, with well-developed entheses indicating large ligaments that supported the massive head. The dorsal vertebrae were tightly packed, limiting downward flexion of the back, and were reinforced by ossified tendons. The pelvis, most of the tail, and the feet remain unknown, though comparison with related taxa suggests the hind feet probably bore three toes.

Body Armor

The armor of Ankylosaurus consisted of osteoderms (bony scutes) embedded in the skin, ranging from approximately 1 cm to 35.5 cm in size. The osteoderms were generally thin-walled and hollow on the underside, smoother than those of Euoplocephalus. Large flat osteoderms with a low marginal keel were likely arranged in transverse and longitudinal rows across the back, with four or five transverse rows separated by skin creases. Two cervical half-rings protected the neck, each consisting of a basal band of bone surmounted by six large keeled osteoderms forming a continuous semicircular yoke over the upper neck (Arbour & Mallon, 2017). Smaller ossicles of various shapes filled the spaces between larger plates.

Tail Club

The tail club of Ankylosaurus is known only from specimen AMNH 5214. It consists of two large osteoderms fused with the distal caudal vertebrae, measuring approximately 57.5 cm in length and 54.5 cm in width (Carpenter, 2004). The club handle was formed by several distal caudal vertebrae stiffened by ossified tendons, while more proximal free caudal vertebrae provided the muscular attachment for lateral swinging.

Arbour (2009) estimated that large ankylosaurid tail clubs could generate impact forces of approximately 7,281–14,360 N upon striking, sufficient to fracture bone. Smaller and average-sized clubs were estimated to be insufficient for bone-breaking impacts. More recently, Arbour & Zanno (2022) documented lateral palaeopathological lesions on the body armor of the closely related Zuul crurivastator, consistent with damage from tail club strikes directed at the flanks. They argued that tail clubs were sexually selected structures used primarily for intraspecific combat—territorial disputes or mating competition—rather than solely for predator defense.

Diet and Ecology

Feeding

Ankylosaurus was an herbivorous dinosaur with small, weak, leaf-shaped teeth and a broad beak. The wide muzzle is interpreted as an adaptation for non-selective low browsing (Carpenter, 2004). Given the very small tooth size and relatively weak jaw musculature, Ankylosaurus likely consumed soft vegetation—ferns, cycads, and early angiosperms—performing minimal oral processing before swallowing, and relying on hindgut fermentation for digestion. No direct evidence of diet (stomach contents or coprolites) has been reported for Ankylosaurus; dietary inferences are based on cranial and dental morphology.

Ecological Role

The Hell Creek–Lance ecosystem in which Ankylosaurus lived supported a diverse dinosaur fauna including Triceratops (ceratopsian), Edmontosaurus (hadrosaurid), and Tyrannosaurus (large theropod). Within this community, Ankylosaurus was a comparatively rare constituent. A contemporary nodosaurid ankylosaur (Denversaurus or Edmontonia) inhabited the same formations but appears to have occupied a different ecological niche, with Ankylosaurus potentially favoring upland habitats (Carpenter, 2004; Arbour & Mallon, 2017).

Defense and Behavior

The full-body armor and tail club would have provided effective defense against large predators such as Tyrannosaurus. However, Arbour & Zanno (2022) presented evidence suggesting the primary function of the tail club may have been intraspecific combat rather than anti-predator defense. Lateral pathological damage on the armor of Zuul is consistent with blows from a tail club directed at the flanks—a distribution inconsistent with predator attacks, which would typically target the dorsal or cervical regions. Locomotion was likely slow given the short, robust limb proportions, with the heavy armor compensating for limited speed.

Distribution and Paleogeography

Geographic Range

Ankylosaurus fossils are known from Montana (Hell Creek Formation), Wyoming (Lance and Ferris formations), Alberta (Scollard Formation), and Saskatchewan (Frenchman Formation)—spanning the western interior of North America. All records are restricted to the latest Maastrichtian, giving the genus a temporal range of approximately 68–66 Ma (roughly 2 million years).

Paleogeographic Context

During the Maastrichtian, the Western Interior Seaway was retreating, exposing broad coastal plains across western North America. According to Arbour & Currie (2016), the Ankylosaurini—the tribe to which Ankylosaurus belongs—originated in Asia and dispersed into North America during the Late Cretaceous. The fossil localities of Ankylosaurus corresponded to paleolatitudes of approximately 55–60°N, within a warm-temperate to subtropical climatic zone.

Phylogeny and Taxonomic Debates

Phylogenetic Placement

Arbour & Currie (2016) conducted a comprehensive morphological phylogenetic analysis of the Ankylosauridae, dividing the family into the subfamily Ankylosaurinae and more basal forms, and erecting the tribe Ankylosaurini within Ankylosaurinae. In this analysis, Ankylosaurus was recovered as a derived member of the Ankylosaurini, with Anodontosaurus and Euoplocephalus as its closest relatives.

Arbour & Mallon (2017) emphasized that Ankylosaurus had diverged substantially from other Laramidian ankylosaurines in skull anatomy (particularly narial position and sinus structure), body size, and tail club handle morphology. They concluded that although Ankylosaurus is popularly treated as the "typical" representative of its family, it is in fact an atypical and highly derived member of the group.

Alternative Hypotheses and Debates

The genus-level validity of Ankylosaurus is universally accepted, but some debate has surrounded dental variation among specimens. Coombs (1990) noted differences in tooth morphology between skulls and considered naming a second species, but refrained due to insufficient documentation of intraspecific variation. Carpenter (2004) accepted all specimens as A. magniventris, noting that ankylosaur teeth are highly variable. No additional species have been named to date. Notably, Nodocephalosaurus shares a similar posterior displacement of the external nares with Ankylosaurus, but phylogenetic analyses do not recover them as close relatives, indicating this feature evolved convergently (Arbour & Currie, 2016).

Reconstruction and Uncertainty

Confirmed, Probable, and Hypothetical

Confirmed: (1) Ankylosaurus is a large ankylosaurid belonging to the Ankylosaurinae, tribe Ankylosaurini. (2) The skull bears four horns and a unique cranial ornamentation pattern with ventrolaterally-directed nostrils. (3) A tail club is present (AMNH 5214). (4) The temporal range is restricted to the late Maastrichtian (~68–66 Ma).

Probable: (1) Total body length approximately 6–8 m, mass approximately 4.78–7.95 tonnes (specimen-dependent; Arbour & Mallon, 2017). (2) Non-selective low browser based on broad muzzle and weak dentition. (3) Asian origin of the Ankylosaurini lineage with dispersal into North America.

Hypothetical: (1) The primary function of the tail club—intraspecific combat versus predator defense—remains debated. (2) The upland habitat preference hypothesis cannot exclude taphonomic bias as an explanation for rarity in lowland deposits. (3) The precise function of the complex narial sinuses (thermoregulation, vocalization, or olfaction) is unresolved.

Popular Media vs. Science

Ankylosaurus is commonly depicted in popular media as an invincible "living tank" lumbering slowly across Cretaceous landscapes. In reality, the fossil record is far more incomplete than such depictions suggest. No complete skeleton has ever been found, and major portions of the postcranium—including the pelvis, most of the tail, and the feet—remain unknown. Furthermore, the exact arrangement of body armor has never been observed in articulation and must be inferred from related taxa. Brown's (1908) original skeletal reconstruction, which was modeled partly after Stegosaurus and lacked a tail club (unknown at the time), influenced popular depictions well into the 1980s before being substantially revised by subsequent research.

Comparison with Related and Contemporary Taxa

TaxonAgeRegionEst. LengthTail Club ShapeNostril Orientation
AnkylosaurusMaastrichtianW. North America (Hell Creek, etc.)6–8 mKnob width ā‰ˆ lengthVentrolateral
EuoplocephalusCampanianAlberta, Canada~5–6 mKnob width ā‰ˆ lengthAnterior to anterolateral
AnodontosaurusCampanianAlberta, Canada~5 mKnob wider than longAnterior to anterolateral
ZuulCampanianMontana, USA~6 mKnob width ā‰ˆ lengthAnterior to anterolateral
ScolosaurusCampanianAlberta, Canada~5–6 mUnknownAnterior to anterolateral

Ankylosaurus is distinguished from these close relatives by its larger overall body size, uniquely ventrolateral nostril orientation, proportionally smaller but more numerous teeth, and U-shaped neural spines on the tail club handle vertebrae.

Fun Facts

šŸ’”
The name Ankylosaurus means 'fused lizard,' referencing the extensive bone fusion throughout its skull and skeleton—the same root as the medical term 'ankylosis.'
šŸ’”
Unlike all other known ankylosaurids, the nostrils of Ankylosaurus opened downward and sideways (ventrolaterally) rather than forward, giving its snout a distinctive bulbous appearance.
šŸ’”
A large ankylosaurid tail club could generate impact forces of 7,000–14,000 N—enough to fracture bone (Arbour, 2009).
šŸ’”
Despite being the 'poster child' for armored dinosaurs, Ankylosaurus was actually quite atypical compared to its close relatives, with unusual nasal anatomy, proportionally tiny teeth, and much larger body size (Arbour & Mallon, 2017).
šŸ’”
No complete Ankylosaurus skeleton has ever been found—the pelvis, most of the tail, and the feet remain unknown to science.
šŸ’”
Barnum Brown's original 1908 skeletal reconstruction was modeled partly after Stegosaurus and lacked a tail club (unknown at the time); this inaccurate depiction influenced popular imagery until the 1980s.
šŸ’”
The nasal passages of Ankylosaurus contained a complex looping airway and five pairs of sinuses, possibly used for thermoregulation, moisture recovery, or vocalization.
šŸ’”
Counterintuitively, the teeth of the largest Ankylosaurus skull (CMN 8880) are absolutely smaller than those of the smallest skull (AMNH 5214)—tooth size did not scale with body size.
šŸ’”
Ankylosaurus osteoderms (bony armor plates) ranged from tiny 1 cm ossicles to large plates 35.5 cm long, and were thin-walled and hollow on the underside.
šŸ’”
A 2022 study on the related Zuul crurivastator found evidence that ankylosaur tail clubs were used primarily for fighting each other—not for fending off predators (Arbour & Zanno, 2022).
šŸ’”
Ankylosaurus coexisted with a nodosaurid ankylosaur (Denversaurus) in the same formations, but the two likely occupied different habitats—Ankylosaurus in the uplands and Denversaurus in the lowlands.
šŸ’”
Ankylosaurus lived during the final 2 million years of the Cretaceous (~68–66 Ma) and was among the very last non-avian dinosaurs, perishing in the K–Pg mass extinction.

FAQ

?Could the Ankylosaurus tail club break bones?
According to a biomechanical study by Arbour (2009), large ankylosaurid tail clubs could generate impact forces of approximately 7,281–14,360 N—sufficient to fracture bone. However, small to average-sized clubs may not have produced enough force for bone-breaking impacts. The only known Ankylosaurus tail club (AMNH 5214) is among the largest known ankylosaurid tail clubs, suggesting this individual at least was capable of delivering bone-breaking blows.
?Why is Ankylosaurus called 'fused lizard'?
The genus name Ankylosaurus combines the Greek words ankulos (fused or stiffened) and sauros (lizard). This name references the medical condition ankylosis—the stiffening of joints through bone fusion—which is extensively seen throughout the skull and skeleton of this animal. The species name magniventris means 'great belly' in Latin, referring to its exceptionally wide body.
?What is unusual about the nostrils of Ankylosaurus?
In most ankylosaurids, the external nares (nostrils) face forward or anterolaterally. In Ankylosaurus, the nostrils are displaced posteriorly and open ventrolaterally (downward and to the sides)—a feature unique among all known ankylosaurids. This resulted from the expansion of the loreal caputegulae (cranial ornamental plates overlying the nasals), which entirely roof the nasal vestibule, giving the snout a distinctive bulbous appearance. Internally, the nasal cavities contained a complex looping airway and multiple sinuses, possibly functioning in thermoregulation or vocalization (Witmer & Ridgely, 2008).
?Why are Ankylosaurus fossils so rare?
Ankylosaurus appears to have been a relatively uncommon member of its ecosystem. Only a handful of specimens are known, and no complete skeleton has been discovered. Some researchers suggest Ankylosaurus may have preferred upland habitats, where fossilization potential in lowland fluvial deposits was lower (Carpenter, 2004). Taphonomic bias may also play a role—the heavy armor may have caused carcasses to settle differently, or preservation conditions in upland environments may have been less favorable.
?Could Ankylosaurus withstand a Tyrannosaurus attack?
The extensive body armor—osteoderms covering the back, flanks, and neck, plus two cervical half-ring armor bands—would have provided substantial protection against predator bites. The tail club could also have served as a defensive weapon. However, the underside of the body and parts of the limbs lacked heavy armor and would have been vulnerable. Juveniles and subadults were likely more susceptible to predation than fully armored adults.
?How heavy was Ankylosaurus?
Body mass estimates vary by specimen and method. Benson et al. (2014) estimated the smallest known skull specimen (AMNH 5214) at approximately 4.78 tonnes. Arbour & Mallon (2017) tentatively estimated the largest skull specimen (CMN 8880) at approximately 7.95 tonnes. These estimates are comparable to or slightly heavier than a modern African elephant (4–7 tonnes).
?Was the tail club used for defense or for fighting other Ankylosaurus?
Traditionally, the tail club was interpreted as an anti-predator weapon. However, Arbour & Zanno (2022) found palaeopathological evidence on the body armor of the closely related Zuul crurivastator—lateral lesions consistent with tail club strikes to the flanks, a pattern inconsistent with predator attacks. They proposed that tail clubs were sexually selected structures used primarily for intraspecific combat (territorial disputes or mating competition). It is likely the club served both functions to some degree.
?What are the closest relatives of Ankylosaurus?
Phylogenetic analysis by Arbour & Currie (2016) places Ankylosaurus within the tribe Ankylosaurini of the subfamily Ankylosaurinae. Its closest known relatives are Anodontosaurus and Euoplocephalus, both from the Campanian of Alberta, Canada. The Ankylosaurini are interpreted as an Asian-origin lineage that dispersed into North America during the Late Cretaceous.
?Has a complete Ankylosaurus skeleton ever been found?
No. Despite being one of the most famous dinosaurs, no complete Ankylosaurus skeleton has been discovered. Major portions of the postcranial skeleton remain unknown, including the pelvis, most of the tail, and the feet. The tail club is known from only a single specimen (AMNH 5214). Ironically, Ankylosaurus is known from far fewer remains than its less famous relatives such as Euoplocephalus.

šŸ“šReferences

  • Brown, B. (1908). The Ankylosauridae, a new family of armored dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 24, 187–201.
  • Carpenter, K. (2004). Redescription of Ankylosaurus magniventris Brown 1908 (Ankylosauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of the Western Interior of North America. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 41(8), 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1139/e04-043
  • Arbour, V. M. & Mallon, J. C. (2017). Unusual cranial and postcranial anatomy in the archetypal ankylosaur Ankylosaurus magniventris. FACETS, 2, 764–794. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0063
  • Arbour, V. M. & Currie, P. J. (2016). Systematics, phylogeny and palaeobiogeography of the ankylosaurid dinosaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 14(5), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2015.1059985
  • Arbour, V. M. (2009). Estimating impact forces of tail club strikes by ankylosaurid dinosaurs. PLoS ONE, 4(8), e6738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006738
  • Arbour, V. M. & Zanno, L. E. (2022). Palaeopathological evidence for intraspecific combat in ankylosaurid dinosaurs. Biology Letters, 18(12), 20220404. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0404
  • Benson, R. B. J., Campione, N. E., Carrano, M. T., Mannion, P. D., Sullivan, C., Upchurch, P., & Evans, D. C. (2014). Rates of dinosaur body mass evolution indicate 170 million years of sustained ecological innovation on the dinosaur stem lineage. PLoS Biology, 12(5), e1001853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001853
  • Coombs, W. P., Jr. (1990). Teeth and taxonomy in ankylosaurs. In K. Carpenter & P. J. Currie (Eds.), Dinosaur Systematics: Approaches and Perspectives (pp. 269–279). Cambridge University Press.
  • Coombs, W. P., Jr. (1978). The families of the ornithischian dinosaur order Ankylosauria. Palaeontology, 21(1), 143–170.
  • Witmer, L. M. & Ridgely, R. C. (2008). The paranasal air sinuses of predatory and armored dinosaurs (Archosauria: Theropoda and Ankylosauria) and their contribution to cephalic structure. The Anatomical Record, 291(11), 1362–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20794
  • Arbour, V. M. & Currie, P. J. (2013). Euoplocephalus tutus and the diversity of ankylosaurid dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, and Montana, USA. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e62421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062421
  • Fowler, D. W. (2020). The Hell Creek Formation, Montana: A stratigraphic review and revision based on a sequence stratigraphic approach. Geosciences, 10(11), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10110435
  • Arbour, V. M. & Evans, D. C. (2017). A new ankylosaurine dinosaur from the Judith River Formation of Montana, USA, based on an exceptional skeleton with soft tissue preservation. Royal Society Open Science, 4(5), 161086. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161086
  • Osborn, H. F. (1905). Tyrannosaurus and other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 21, 259–265.
  • Carpenter, K. (2001). Phylogenetic analysis of the Ankylosauria. In K. Carpenter (Ed.), The Armored Dinosaurs (pp. 455–483). Indiana University Press.
  • Williston, S. W. (1908). Review of The Ankylosauridae. American Journal of Science, 4(25), 135–136.

Gallery

3 images
  • Ankylosaurus (Ankylosaurus magniventris) 1
    Ankylosaurus

    Ankylosaurus Ā· Cretaceous Period Ā· Herbivore

  • Ankylosaurus (Ankylosaurus magniventris) 2
    Ankylosaurus

    Ankylosaurus Ā· Cretaceous Period Ā· Herbivore

  • Ankylosaurus (Ankylosaurus magniventris) 3
    Ankylosaurus

    Ankylosaurus Ā· Cretaceous Period Ā· Herbivore

šŸ”—Related Creatures