Regaliceratops

Cretaceous Period Herbivore Creature Type

Regaliceratops peterhewsi

Scientific Name: "Latin regalis (royal) + Greek keras (horn) + ops (face) = 'royal horned face'; the species name peterhewsi honours geologist Peter Hews, who discovered the fossil"

Local Name: Regaliceratops

šŸ•Cretaceous Period
🌿Herbivore

Physical Characteristics

šŸ“
Size5m
āš–ļø
Weight1500~2000kg

Discovery

šŸ“…
Discovery Year2015Year
šŸ‘¤
DiscovererCaleb M. Brown & Donald M. Henderson
šŸ“
Discovery LocationSouthwestern Alberta, Canada; Oldman River, Waldron Flats area, St. Mary River Formation

Habitat

šŸ”ļø
Geological FormationSt. Mary River Formation
šŸŒ
EnvironmentFreshwater fluvial and floodplain environment (semi-arid climate; interbedded sandstone-siltstone depositional facies)
🪨
LithologyFine-grained sandstone, grey shale, coquinoid beds, carbonaceous mudstone, coal beds, interbedded sandstone-siltstone
Regaliceratops (Regaliceratops peterhewsi) restoration

Regaliceratops (Regaliceratops peterhewsi Brown & Henderson, 2015) is a chasmosaurine ceratopsid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous (middle Maastrichtian, approximately 68.5–67.5 Ma) of what is now southwestern Alberta, Canada. The genus name combines the Latin regalis (royal) with the Greek keras (κέρας, horn) and ops (ὤψ, face), meaning "royal horned face"—a reference both to the crown-like arrangement of massive epiossifications along the frill margin and to the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, which houses the specimen. The species epithet peterhewsi honours geologist Peter Hews, who in 2005 first spotted the tip of the snout protruding from a cliff face along the Oldman River.

Known from a single holotype specimen (TMP 2005.055.0001), a nearly complete skull lacking only the rostral bone and lower jaws, Regaliceratops is estimated at approximately 5 m in length and 1.5–2 tonnes in body mass (Paul, 2016; Pickrell, 2016). Its maximum sagittal skull length is approximately 1,570 mm (Brown & Henderson, 2015). The most remarkable aspect of this dinosaur is that it provides the first clear evidence of convergent evolution in display structures between dinosaur clades within Ceratopsidae. Despite being phylogenetically nested within Chasmosaurinae, Regaliceratops exhibits a cranial ornamentation pattern—large nasal horncore, small postorbital horncores, and elaborate frill epiossifications—that is strikingly similar to the centrosaurine subfamily (Centrosaurinae), which had largely gone extinct in North America by the early Maastrichtian.

The specimen earned the nickname "Hellboy" from the excavation team, owing to the extreme difficulty of the recovery—the skull was embedded in heavily cemented siltstone near protected bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) spawning habitat—and the small postorbital horncores topped with distinct resorption pits that evoked the comic book character's stumpy horns.

Overview

Etymology and Naming History

The generic name carries a dual meaning. The Latin regalis (royal) refers to the crown-like arrangement of frill epiossifications, while simultaneously paying tribute to the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, which received the "Royal" designation from Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in 1990 (Brown & Henderson, 2015). The Greek components keras (horn) and ops (face) are the traditional elements used in ceratopsian nomenclature.

The species name peterhewsi honours geologist Peter Hews, who in 2005 noticed the tip of a snout protruding from a cliff along the Oldman River in southwestern Alberta, approximately 164 km south of Calgary, in the Waldron Flats area. He reported the find to the Royal Tyrrell Museum. The skull was excavated in two field seasons (2006 and 2008) by museum teams, who removed it in blocks. The excavation was complicated by the extremely hard siltstone matrix and the proximity of the site to protected bull trout spawning habitat, which required special environmental precautions. Royal Tyrrell Museum senior technician Darren H. Tanke spent 17 months preparing the specimen from its matrix. In 2015, Caleb M. Brown and Donald M. Henderson formally named and described the new genus and species in Current Biology.

Systematic Position

Regaliceratops is classified within Ornithischia, Ceratopsia, Ceratopsidae, Chasmosaurinae. In the original description, Brown & Henderson (2015) placed it within the tribe Triceratopsini, in a polytomy with Eotriceratops and Ojoceratops, as sister taxa to the remaining Triceratopsini (Triceratops, Torosaurus, Nedoceratops, Titanoceratops).

However, a subsequent phylogenetic analysis by Mallon et al. (2016) recovered Regaliceratops outside Triceratopsini, in a polytomy with Anchiceratops and Arrhinoceratops. Most recently, Dalman et al. (2022) once again recovered Regaliceratops within Triceratopsini, as a sister taxon to Triceratops (T. horridus, T. prorsus) and Ojoceratops. While the precise phylogenetic placement varies between analyses, its position as a derived chasmosaurine is consistently supported.

Scientific Significance

The most important scientific contribution of Regaliceratops is that it documents the first clear case of convergent evolution in horn-like display structures between dinosaur clades (Brown & Henderson, 2015). Ceratopsidae has historically been divided along clearly distinct cranial ornamentation patterns: Chasmosaurinae (e.g., Triceratops, Pentaceratops) typically exhibit large postorbital horns, small nasal horns, and relatively simple frills that emphasize frill length; Centrosaurinae (e.g., Styracosaurus, Centrosaurus) typically show large nasal horns, small postorbital horns, and elaborate frill epiossifications (Dodson, 1993; Farlow & Dodson, 1975). Regaliceratops is phylogenetically a chasmosaurine yet exhibits the centrosaurine-type ornamentation pattern, and when its nasal-to-postorbital horncore ratio is plotted, it falls within the morphospace of Campanian centrosaurines rather than Maastrichtian chasmosaurines (Brown & Henderson, 2015: Figure 4). This indicates that after centrosaurines went largely extinct in the early Maastrichtian, the chasmosaurine Regaliceratops independently evolved a convergent display morphology.

Geological Age, Stratigraphy, and Depositional Setting

Geological Age and Dating

Regaliceratops lived during the Late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian stage. The St. Mary River Formation as a whole spans approximately 71.9–67 Ma (Fowler, 2017). The holotype was recovered from the upper approximately 30 m of the formation, which correlates with the upper Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Carbon Member and Whitemud Member) of southern Alberta. Since the Carbon Member is well dated to approximately 67.5–68.5 Ma (Wu et al., 2007; Eberth & Braman, 2012; Eberth et al., 2013), the holotype is assigned a middle Maastrichtian age. This stratigraphic correlation is further supported by the presence of the angiosperm palynomorph Scollardia trapaformis in the host matrix (Brown & Henderson, 2015).

This time interval immediately precedes the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) mass extinction and represents the final diversification phase of non-avian dinosaurs. Regaliceratops lived slightly earlier than Triceratops, during a period when centrosaurines had largely disappeared from North America and chasmosaurines were diversifying.

Formation and Lithology

The holotype was recovered from the St. Mary River Formation of southwestern Alberta. This formation is part of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and extends from southwestern Alberta into northwesternmost Montana (Mossop & Shetsen, 1994; Prior et al., 2013). Formation thickness reaches approximately 762 m along the Crowsnest and Castle Rivers and approximately 457 m along the Oldman River.

The St. Mary River Formation is divided into two broadly defined units. The basal 30–60 m was deposited in brackish water environments and is characterised by fine-grained sandstones, grey shales, coquinoid beds (concentrations of Ostrea and Corbicula shells), carbonaceous mudstones, and coal beds. The remainder of the formation records freshwater fluvial and floodplain environments and consists of interbedded sandstone and siltstone with minor occurrences of carbonaceous shale and coal (Hamblin, 1998). The fossil was preserved in heavily cemented siltstone at the Waldron Flats locality along the Oldman River.

Palaeoenvironment

The St. Mary River Formation records a semi-arid fluvial system (Nadon, 1989; Hamblin, 1998). Plant fossils are diverse: Bell (1949) described 18 leaf species, and subsequent work increased the total to at least 32 species. The assemblage includes ferns (Hydropteris pinnata: Rothwell & Stockey, 1994), Ginkgo, conifers, a Trapa-like aquatic angiosperm (Trapago angulata: Stockey & Rothwell, 1997), sabaloid palms, at least six types of large monocot leaves, the aquatic angiosperm Cardstonia tolmanii (Riley & Stockey, 2004), the floating aquatic Tolmania aquatica (Edmonds et al., 2022), and the amphibious eudicot Zlatkovia crenulata (Rothwell & Stockey, 2022).

Contemporaneous fauna includes the nodosaurid ankylosaur Edmontonia (cf. E. longiceps), the leptoceratopsid Montanoceratops cerorhynchus, the centrosaurine ceratopsid Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis, ceratopsid material previously referred to Anchiceratops (precise species attribution uncertain: Weishampel et al., 2004), the albertosaurine tyrannosaurid Albertosaurus, the dromaeosaurid Saurornitholestes (cf. sp.), the troodontid Troodon sp., mammals (Cimolomys gracilis, Meniscoessus conquista, Mesodma cf. thompsoni, Cimolodon nitidus, Pediomys cf. cooki, Didelphodon sp., Eodelphis sp.), fish (Myledaphus, Lepisosteus), the crocodylomorph Leidyosuchus, and the choristodere Champsosaurus (Sloan & Russell, 1974; Hunter et al., 2010; Weishampel et al., 2004).

Specimen and Diagnostic Characters

Holotype and Only Known Specimen

Regaliceratops is known from a single specimen, TMP 2005.055.0001, housed at the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology. The holotype consists of a nearly complete cranium (skull excluding the lower jaw), missing only the rostral bone. The palatal and braincase regions are obscured by matrix. The maximum sagittal length of the skull is approximately 1,570 mm (Brown & Henderson, 2015).

The specimen represents an adult individual, as indicated by the fused cranial elements and rugose bone surface texture, unlike the smoother texture seen in juvenile and subadult ceratopsids. The skull has experienced post-depositional deformation, including rostrocaudal compression of the entire cranium, dorsal shear of the narial region, and dorsal deflection of the parietosquamosal frill (Brown & Henderson, 2015).

Diagnosis

Brown & Henderson (2015) diagnosed Regaliceratops based on the following autapomorphies (marked with ) and a unique suite of synapomorphies.

A single, midline epiparietal ossification (P0 locus) is present that is rostrodorsally offset from the plane of the frill and other epiparietals, projects caudally beyond the parietal, and has a roughly triangular transverse cross-section (). A prominent midline ridge (sagittal keel) on the parietal is confluent with the median epiparietal (). Paired epiparietal ossifications (P1–P2) are long, flat, and roughly pentagonal or spade-shaped (). A prominent postorbital ridge runs diagonally from the supraorbital horncore to the base of the squamosal. Parietal fenestrae are small or subequal in size to the orbit (shared with Kosmoceratops). The nasal horncore is larger than the postorbital horncores (shared with Chasmosaurus belli and Vagaceratops).

Limitations of the Specimen

Because Regaliceratops is known only from a single skull, no postcranial skeletal information is available. Body length (ca. 5 m) and mass (ca. 1.5–2 t) estimates therefore rely on indirect comparisons with closely related taxa based on skull proportions. Additionally, with only a single individual known, intraspecific variation, sexual dimorphism, and ontogenetic changes cannot be assessed. The skull itself has undergone post-depositional deformation (rostrocaudal compression, narial shearing, frill deflection), which may exaggerate or distort certain morphological features.

Morphology and Function

Body Form and Size

Regaliceratops is estimated at approximately 5 m (16 ft) in length and 1.5–2 tonnes (1,500–2,000 kg) in body mass (Paul, 2016; Pickrell, 2016). This makes it smaller than Triceratops (ca. 8–9 m, 6–12 t) but still a substantial medium-large ceratopsid and one of the major herbivores of its ecosystem. These estimates, however, are indirect, being based solely on skull proportions, and could be revised if postcranial material is discovered.

The maximum sagittal skull length of approximately 1,570 mm is considerable, and since the rostral bone is missing, the total skull length would have been greater still.

Nasal and Postorbital Horns

One of the most distinctive features of Regaliceratops is the size reversal of the horns compared to most chasmosaurines. The nasal horncore has a preserved height of approximately 148 mm; extrapolation of the horn's lateral slopes yields an estimated total height of 240–280 mm, making it one of the tallest nasal horncores in Chasmosaurinae (Brown & Henderson, 2015). It is straight, projects dorsally and slightly rostrally, and is teardrop-shaped in horizontal cross-section, with a broad rostral margin and tapered caudal margin.

In contrast, the postorbital horncores are approximately 140 mm in height with a rostrocaudal base length of approximately 110 mm—distinctly smaller than the nasal horn. They have narrow bases and taper distally, with the apex of each bearing a distinct resorption pit (Brown & Henderson, 2015). The horncores are dorsally directed and procurved (curved rostrally), as in Pentaceratops. This horn ratio—large nasal horn, small postorbital horns—is characteristic of centrosaurines and is found within Chasmosaurinae only in Chasmosaurus belli and Vagaceratops.

Frill and Epiossifications

The parietosquamosal frill is nearly semicircular in rostrodorsal view, with epiossifications uniformly spaced along the circumference. It is short and wide, with the greatest transverse width at midlength, as in Torosaurus and Triceratops. The frill is shorter than the preorbital length and less than 70% of basal skull length, though this may be partly exaggerated by post-depositional rostrocaudal compression.

The dorsal midline of the parietal preserves a prominent sagittal keel that runs from the rostralmost point of the parietal to the base of the large midline epiossification (P0) near the caudal margin. P0 is a single, unpaired, large structure located at the caudal midline of the parietal, rostrodorsally offset from the caudal margin, projecting caudally, and triangular in cross-section. It is confluent with the sagittal keel and is interpreted as homologous to the P0 of Triceratops and the laterally curved hooks of Anchiceratops.

The remaining caudolateral periphery is adorned with seven pairs of flat, distally attenuated epiossifications on each side, decreasing in size from largest caudomedially to smallest rostrolaterally. Two paired epiparietals (P1 and P2) are fused exclusively to the caudal parietal and are large (maximum length 201 mm, exceeding the postorbital horncore bases) and roughly pentagonal or spade-shaped. These represent the largest frill epiossifications recorded in Chasmosaurinae (Brown & Henderson, 2015). Four episquamosals (S1–S4) are fused to the lateral squamosal margin; the rostralmost three (S2–S4) are roughly triangular and decrease slightly in size rostrally, while the caudalmost (S1) is pentagonal or spade-shaped and distinctly larger. One paired epiparietosquamosal (PS) articulates along the parietosquamosal suture and is transitional in shape and size.

Other Cranial Features

The snout is short and tall, though partly exaggerated by tectonic shortening. The paired premaxillae form the median premaxillary septum with a thin septal fossa and a large interpremaxillary fenestra, characteristic of Maastrichtian chasmosaurines. The narial strut is sinuous in shape, contrasting with the broad triangular form in Triceratops and Titanoceratops.

The orbits are highly ellipsoidal, unlike the slightly ellipsoidal orbits of other ceratopsids. The rostrodorsal orbital margin features a prominent antorbital buttress formed by the rugose, swollen palpebral, which is larger than in most chasmosaurines. The ventrolateral extremity of the jugal is triangular, capped by a large, conical epijugal whose base is only slightly smaller than the postorbital horncore bases.

Small, paired parietal fenestrae are situated entirely within the parietal and do not contact the squamosal laterally, unlike the condition in Chasmosaurus, Agujaceratops, and Pentaceratops.

Diet and Ecology

Diet

Like all ceratopsids, Regaliceratops was herbivorous. The keratinous beak was suited for cropping tough vegetation, and the complex dental battery was adapted for efficient processing of fibrous plant material.

The rich plant fossil record of the St. Mary River Formation—ferns, Ginkgo, conifers, Trapa-like aquatic angiosperms, sabaloid palms, large monocots, and aquatic plants—indicates a diverse flora from which Regaliceratops would have fed. The relatively low head posture of ceratopsids is consistent with browsing on low-growing vegetation.

Horn and Frill Function

The function of ceratopsid horns and frills has long been debated, with proposed hypotheses including predator defence, intraspecific combat (head-locking), and sociosexual display and species recognition (Farlow & Dodson, 1975; Farke, 2004; Farke et al., 2009). The small postorbital horncores of Regaliceratops appear better suited for visual display than for physical combat.

Brown & Henderson (2015) interpreted the convergent ornamentation pattern as potentially reflecting not only morphological but also behavioural convergence with centrosaurines, noting that in fossil and extant mammals, convergent horn evolution often correlates with convergent social behaviours (Geist, 1966, 1998). They hypothesised that Regaliceratops may have converged behaviourally with centrosaurines following the latter's early Maastrichtian extinction.

Ecological Role

Regaliceratops occupied the role of a medium-large herbivore in the middle Maastrichtian ecosystem of southwestern Alberta. It coexisted with Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis (a centrosaurine), ceratopsid material referred to Anchiceratops, Montanoceratops (a leptoceratopsid), and the nodosaurid Edmontonia, among other ornithischians. It would have been potential prey for the large tyrannosaurid Albertosaurus.

Distribution and Palaeogeography

Geographic Distribution

Regaliceratops is currently known exclusively from a single locality in the St. Mary River Formation of southwestern Alberta, Canada. The holotype was found in the Waldron Flats area along the Oldman River, approximately 164 km south of Calgary. Although the St. Mary River Formation extends into northwesternmost Montana (Mossop & Shetsen, 1994), no Regaliceratops material has been reported from other localities.

Palaeogeographic Context

During the Late Cretaceous, western North America formed the island continent of Laramidia, separated from eastern Appalachia by the Western Interior Seaway. By the middle Maastrichtian, when Regaliceratops lived, the seaway was progressively retreating, expanding terrestrial habitats and influencing faunal turnover. The approximate palaeocoordinates of the St. Mary River Formation are 49.6°N, 86.5°W.

Phylogeny and Taxonomic Debate

Phylogenetic Position Through Time

The phylogenetic placement of Regaliceratops has shifted across three major analyses.

Brown & Henderson (2015) used a revised data matrix incorporating reassessed epiossification homologies and recovered Regaliceratops within Triceratopsini, in a polytomy with Eotriceratops and Ojoceratops, as sister taxa to the remaining Triceratopsini (Titanoceratops, Nedoceratops, Torosaurus, Triceratops). Their analysis supported a deep split within Chasmosaurinae into an older Chasmosaurus clade (primarily Campanian) and a younger Triceratops clade (primarily Maastrichtian).

Mallon et al. (2016), in the description of Spiclypeus, recovered Regaliceratops outside Triceratopsini, in a polytomy with Anchiceratops and Arrhinoceratops.

Dalman et al. (2022), in the description of Sierraceratops, once again recovered Regaliceratops within Triceratopsini, as a sister taxon to Triceratops (T. horridus, T. prorsus) and Ojoceratops.

Implications of Convergent Evolution

The discovery of Regaliceratops significantly expanded the known morphological disparity of Maastrichtian chasmosaurines. Brown & Henderson (2015) plotted postorbital horncore length against nasal horncore length and demonstrated that Regaliceratops falls well outside the morphospace of other Maastrichtian chasmosaurines, instead falling within the morphospace of Campanian centrosaurines.

This has two major evolutionary implications. First, the near-simultaneous extinction of centrosaurines and the older Chasmosaurus clade in the early Maastrichtian may have opened ecological space for the Triceratopsini to diversify and explore novel display morphologies. Second, the base of the Triceratops clade implies a ghost lineage of approximately 3 million years, suggesting considerable undiscovered chasmosaurine diversity in the Campanian–Maastrichtian interval.

Reconstruction and Uncertainty

Confirmed Features

Anatomically confirmed features observed directly on the holotype skull include the large nasal horncore (preserved height 148 mm, estimated total height 240–280 mm) and small postorbital horncores (ca. 140 mm height) with resorption pits; the crown-like arrangement of massive frill epiossifications (P0 with triangular cross-section, P1–P2 up to 201 mm in maximum length, S1–S4, PS pairs); the short, wide, semicircular frill; the sagittal keel confluent with the median P0 epiparietal; and the small parietal fenestrae.

Hypothetical and Estimated Features

Since no postcranial skeleton is known, the body length (ca. 5 m) and mass (ca. 1.5–2 t) estimates are indirect, based on scaling from skull size against closely related taxa. Skin colour and patterning, specific behavioural repertoires, and the precise functional role of the horns and frill all lack direct evidence and remain hypothetical or inferred. The behavioural convergence hypothesis with centrosaurines (Brown & Henderson, 2015) is an intriguing proposal but currently rests on indirect morphological evidence.

Limitations of a Single Specimen

With only a single adult skull available, the following remain unknown: the range of intraspecific variation; whether sexual dimorphism was present; ontogenetic changes in skull ornamentation through growth; postcranial anatomy; and the true geographic range and ecological preferences of the species. Additionally, the post-depositional deformation of the skull (rostrocaudal compression, narial shearing, frill deflection) may have exaggerated or distorted certain morphological features.

Comparison with Related and Contemporaneous Taxa

TaxonBinomialSubfamilyNasal vs postorbital hornFrill featuresAge
RegaliceratopsR. peterhewsiChasmosaurinaeNasal > postorbitalLarge pentagonal/triangular epiossifications, sagittal keelMiddle Maastrichtian
TriceratopsTriceratops spp.ChasmosaurinaeNasal postorbitalLong radiating epiossificationsCampanian

Specimen Summary

Specimen numberElements preservedLocalityStratigraphic positionReference
TMP 2005.055.0001 (holotype)Nearly complete skull (rostral bone, lower jaw missing; palate and braincase obscured by matrix)SW Alberta, Waldron Flats, Oldman River (ca. 164 km S of Calgary)Upper ca. 30 m of St. Mary River Fm., middle MaastrichtianBrown & Henderson (2015)

Fun Facts

šŸ’”
Regaliceratops was discovered in 2005 when geologist Peter Hews noticed the tip of a snout sticking out of a cliff along the Oldman River in southwestern Alberta. It took a full decade from discovery to formal scientific publication.
šŸ’”
The nickname 'Hellboy' was earned through the extremely difficult excavation (cemented siltstone matrix, proximity to protected bull trout spawning habitat) and the small postorbital horncores topped with resorption pits that resembled the comic character's stumpy horns.
šŸ’”
Regaliceratops is the first documented case of convergent evolution in horn-like display structures between dinosaur clades. Its nasal-to-postorbital horn ratio places it firmly within centrosaurine morphospace despite being a chasmosaurine.
šŸ’”
The word 'regal' in the name carries a double meaning: it describes the crown-like frill ornamentation and simultaneously honours the Royal Tyrrell Museum, which received its 'Royal' designation from Queen Elizabeth II in 1990.
šŸ’”
The two pairs of pentagonal epiparietals (P1–P2) on the frill reach a maximum length of 201 mm, making them the largest frill epiossifications recorded in any chasmosaurine ceratopsid.
šŸ’”
Royal Tyrrell Museum senior technician Darren H. Tanke spent 17 months meticulously freeing the skull from its extremely hard siltstone matrix before its full 'crown' of ornamentation was revealed.
šŸ’”
The excavation site was located near protected spawning habitat for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), forcing the palaeontology team to comply with strict environmental regulations throughout the recovery.
šŸ’”
The nasal horncore of Regaliceratops is one of the tallest in Chasmosaurinae, with a preserved height of 148 mm (the tip was eroded) and an estimated total height of 240–280 mm.
šŸ’”
Brown & Henderson (2015) noted that the discovery implies a ghost lineage of approximately 3 million years at the base of the Triceratops clade, suggesting substantial undiscovered ceratopsid diversity in the Campanian–Maastrichtian interval.
šŸ’”
Regaliceratops lived slightly before Triceratops (middle Maastrichtian, ca. 68.5–67.5 Ma) and demonstrates that ceratopsid diversity and morphological disparity just before the K–Pg mass extinction were far greater than previously recognised.

FAQ

?Why was Regaliceratops nicknamed 'Hellboy'?
The nickname arose for two reasons. First, the excavation was extremely difficult: the fossil was embedded in heavily cemented siltstone, and the site was near protected bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) spawning habitat, requiring special environmental precautions. Second, the small postorbital horncores—each topped with a distinct resorption pit—evoked the stumpy horns of the comic book character Hellboy. The combination of the hellish excavation experience and the horn appearance led the team to adopt the nickname.
?Why is the frill of Regaliceratops compared to a crown?
The frill margin is adorned with massive epiossifications arranged in a striking pattern: two pairs of large pentagonal epiparietals (P1–P2, up to 201 mm long), a triangular median epiparietal (P0) at the midline, and flanking triangular episquamosals (S2–S4) and a spade-shaped episquamosal (S1). When viewed from above, these ornaments resemble the jewels of a crown. This inspired the Latin 'regalis' (royal) in the generic name, which also honours the Royal Tyrrell Museum.
?How does Regaliceratops differ from Triceratops?
Both belong to Chasmosaurinae, but their horn proportions are reversed. Triceratops has large postorbital (brow) horns and a small nasal horn, while Regaliceratops has a large nasal horn (estimated 240–280 mm tall) and small postorbital horns (ca. 140 mm). Additionally, the frill of Regaliceratops is elaborately decorated with some of the largest epiossifications recorded in Chasmosaurinae, whereas the frill of Triceratops is relatively simple. Size also differs: Regaliceratops (ca. 5 m, 1.5–2 t) was considerably smaller than Triceratops (ca. 8–9 m, 6–12 t).
?What does it mean that Regaliceratops resembles centrosaurines?
Ceratopsidae is divided into Chasmosaurinae (typically large brow horns, small nasal horn, simpler frill) and Centrosaurinae (typically large nasal horn, small brow horns, elaborate frill epiossifications). Although Regaliceratops is phylogenetically a chasmosaurine, its cranial ornamentation pattern matches the centrosaurine type. When its nasal-to-postorbital horn ratio is plotted on a graph, it falls within centrosaurine morphospace rather than chasmosaurine morphospace. This is interpreted as convergent evolution: after centrosaurines went largely extinct in the early Maastrichtian, the chasmosaurine Regaliceratops independently evolved a similar display morphology.
?How large was Regaliceratops?
It is estimated at approximately 5 m (16 ft) in length and 1.5–2 tonnes (1,500–2,000 kg) in body mass (Paul, 2016; Pickrell, 2016). The skull has a maximum sagittal length of approximately 1,570 mm (about 1.57 m), measured without the missing rostral bone. However, these size estimates are indirect, based on skull proportions compared to related taxa, since no postcranial skeleton is known.
?What were the horns and frill used for?
The exact function is not definitively established, but most researchers favour sociosexual display (mate competition) and species recognition as primary roles. The small postorbital horncores seem better suited as visual signals than for physical combat. Brown & Henderson (2015) suggested that the convergent ornamentation may reflect convergent social behaviours, drawing parallels with fossil and extant mammals in which convergent horn evolution often correlates with similar social structures (Geist, 1966).
?When and where did Regaliceratops live?
Regaliceratops lived during the Late Cretaceous, middle Maastrichtian stage (approximately 68.5–67.5 million years ago), in what is now southwestern Alberta, Canada. The environment was a semi-arid fluvial floodplain system with diverse vegetation including ferns, conifers, palms, and aquatic plants—over 32 plant species have been identified from the St. Mary River Formation. This interval immediately precedes the K–Pg mass extinction and is slightly older than the age of Triceratops.
?Why is only a skull known for Regaliceratops?
Fossilisation and subsequent discovery depend on many chance factors. In the case of Regaliceratops, only the skull was preserved in suitable conditions and became exposed at the Oldman River cliff face; the rest of the skeleton may have been eroded away or remains undiscovered. Ceratopsid skulls, being large and heavily ossified, generally have higher fossilisation and discovery potential relative to other skeletal elements. Future fieldwork may reveal additional specimens with postcranial material.
?Why did it take 10 years from discovery to formal naming?
After Peter Hews discovered the fossil in 2005, excavation took place over two field seasons (2006 and 2008). The heavily cemented siltstone matrix and the proximity to protected bull trout habitat made extraction complicated. Senior technician Darren H. Tanke then spent 17 months painstakingly preparing the specimen from its matrix. After preparation, detailed anatomical description, phylogenetic analysis, and the peer review process followed before Brown & Henderson published the formal description in Current Biology in 2015.

šŸ“šReferences

  • Brown, C. M., & Henderson, D. M. (2015). A new horned dinosaur reveals convergent evolution in cranial ornamentation in Ceratopsidae. Current Biology, 25(12), 1641–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.041
  • Paul, G. S. (2016). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 300.
  • Mallon, J. C., Ott, C. J., Larson, P. L., Iuliano, E. M., & Evans, D. C. (2016). Spiclypeus shipporum gen. et sp. nov., a boldly audacious new chasmosaurine ceratopsid (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Judith River Formation (Upper Cretaceous: Campanian) of Montana, USA. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154218
  • Dalman, S. G., Lucas, S. G., Jasinski, S. E., & Longrich, N. R. (2022). Sierraceratops turneri, a new chasmosaurine ceratopsid from the Hall Lake Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of south-central New Mexico. Cretaceous Research, 130, 105034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105034
  • Fowler, D. W. (2017). Revised geochronology, correlation, and dinosaur stratigraphic ranges of the Santonian-Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) formations of the Western Interior of North America. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0188426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188426
  • Wu, X.-C., Brinkman, D. B., Eberth, D. A., & Braman, D. R. (2007). A new ceratopsid dinosaur (Ornithischia) from the uppermost Horseshoe Canyon Formation (upper Maastrichtian), Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44(9), 1243–1265. https://doi.org/10.1139/e07-011
  • Eberth, D. A., & Braman, D. R. (2012). A revised stratigraphy and depositional history for the Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Upper Cretaceous), southern Alberta plains. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49(9), 1053–1086. https://doi.org/10.1139/e2012-035
  • Eberth, D. A., Evans, D. C., Brinkman, D., Therrien, F., Tanke, D. H., & Russell, L. S. (2013). Dinosaur biostratigraphy of the Edmonton Group (Upper Cretaceous), Alberta, Canada: evidence for climate influence. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 50(7), 701–726. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2012-0185
  • Nadon, G. C. (1989). Sedimentology of the Upper Cretaceous St. Mary River Formation, southern Alberta. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta.
  • Hamblin, A. P. (1998). Edmonton Group/St Mary River Formation: Summary of Literature and Concepts. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 3578.
  • Bell, W. A. (1949). Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene floras of western Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, 13, 231 pp.
  • Stockey, R. A., & Rothwell, G. W. (1997). The aquatic angiosperm Trapago angulata from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) St. Mary River Formation of southern Alberta. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 158(1), 83–94.
  • Riley, M. G., & Stockey, R. A. (2004). Cardstonia tolmanii gen. et sp. nov. (Limnocharitaceae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 165(5), 897–916.
  • Sloan, R. E., & Russell, L. S. (1974). Mammals of the St. Mary River Formation (Cretaceous) of southwestern Alberta. Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum, Number 95.
  • Hunter, J. P., Heinrich, R. E., & Weishampel, D. B. (2010). Mammals from the St. Mary River Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Montana. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 30(3), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724631003763490
  • Weishampel, D. B., Barrett, P. M., Coria, R. A., Le Loeuff, J., Xu, X., Zhao, X., Sahni, A., Gomani, E. M. P., & Noto, C. R. (2004). Dinosaur distribution. In D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, & H. Osmólska (Eds.), The Dinosauria (2nd ed., pp. 517–606). University of California Press.
  • Pickrell, J. (2016). Weird Dinosaurs: The Strange New Fossils Challenging Everything We Thought We Knew. Columbia University Press.
  • Farlow, J. O., & Dodson, P. (1975). The behavioral significance of frill and horn morphology in ceratopsian dinosaurs. Evolution, 29(2), 353–361.
  • Geist, V. (1966). The evolution of horn-like organs. Behaviour, 27(3–4), 175–214.
  • Dodson, P. (1993). Comparative craniology of the Ceratopsia. American Journal of Science, 293-A, 200–234.
  • Farke, A. A. (2004). Horn use in Triceratops (Dinosauria: Ceratopsidae): testing behavioral hypotheses using scale models. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7(1), 1–10.
  • Farke, A. A., Wolff, E. D. S., & Tanke, D. H. (2009). Evidence of combat in Triceratops. PLoS ONE, 4(1), e4252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004252
  • Sampson, S. D., & Loewen, M. A. (2010). Unraveling a radiation: a review of the diversity, stratigraphic distribution, biogeography, and evolution of horned dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae). In M. Ryan, B. J. Chinnery-Allgeier, & D. A. Eberth (Eds.), New Perspectives on Horned Dinosaurs (pp. 405–427). Indiana University Press.
  • Mossop, G. D., & Shetsen, I. (Compilers) (1994). The Geological Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Chapter 24. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists.

Gallery

2 images
  • Regaliceratops (Regaliceratops peterhewsi) 1
    Regaliceratops

    Regaliceratops Ā· Cretaceous Period Ā· Herbivore

  • Regaliceratops (Regaliceratops peterhewsi) 2
    Regaliceratops

    Regaliceratops Ā· Cretaceous Period Ā· Herbivore

šŸ”—Related Creatures